The Supreme Court dismissed the Income Tax Department’s appeal due to delay, upholding the Delhi High Court order quashing reassessment proceedings against NDTV’s holding company RRPR Holdings. The ruling reinforces that reassessment cannot continue when the main tax claim itself has already been rejected in appellate proceedings.
The Supreme Court on Thursday dismissed the appeal filed by the Income Tax Department against a judgment of the Delhi High Court, which had earlier quashed reassessment proceedings initiated against NDTV’s holding company, RRPR Holdings Private Limited.
A Bench of Justices PS Narasimha and Alok Aradhe dismissed the appeal on the ground of delay. As a result, the judgment of the Delhi High Court has now become final and binding.
The case relates to the assessment year 2009–10. During this period, the tax officer observed that RRPR Holdings had incurred large finance costs, including interest on borrowings, while it had earned only a small amount of exempt income. The officer believed that these expenses were related to investments that generated exempt income and therefore invoked the relevant tax provisions to disallow such expenditure.
The disallowance amount was calculated at more than ₹66 crore under the prescribed formula, even though the exempt income earned by the company was only about ₹38 lakh. RRPR Holdings challenged this decision before the appellate authorities.
In its order dated August 18, 2021, the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) ruled that disallowance of expenditure linked to exempt income cannot be more than the exempt income itself. The Tribunal directed that the disallowance should be limited to the actual exempt income earned by the company. The ITAT also held that interest income earned by the company from fixed deposits should be adjusted against the interest expenditure, instead of being taxed separately on an estimated basis.
Both the Revenue’s appeal and the company’s cross-objection were partly allowed by the Tribunal.
At the same time, the tax department had issued a reassessment notice dated August 8, 2014, alleging irregularities relating to interest-free loans.
The Delhi High Court examined the matter and noted that the original addition was based on the same disallowance provisions that had already been examined in appellate proceedings. By the time the writ petition was heard, the Tribunal had already ruled that those provisions could not be invoked in the absence of exempt income.
A Division Bench of Justices Yashwant Varma and Ravinder Dudeja held that this finding went to the very root of the reassessment proceedings. The Court observed,
“On this short ground alone, we find ourselves unable to sustain the impugned action.”
The High Court held that since the Tribunal’s ruling was binding on the parties, the reassessment notice could not survive and therefore it was quashed.
With the Supreme Court dismissing the Income Tax Department’s appeal on the ground of delay, the Delhi High Court judgment has now attained finality.
This ruling is important because it makes it clear that reassessment proceedings cannot continue when the main tax claim itself has been significantly changed or rejected in appellate proceedings. The judgment reinforces the legal position that reassessment must be based on valid and surviving grounds, and if the foundation of the reassessment is removed, the reassessment proceedings cannot continue.
Case Title:
Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax v. RRPR
Click Here to Read More Reports on NDTV
