The Supreme Court of India has stayed recovery of ₹14.91 crore customs demand against HP India in a dispute over classification of Latex printers. The Court granted interim relief and issued notice, putting the recovery on hold till the next hearing.
The Supreme Court held amalgamated companies cannot claim set off of predecessor losses under Kerala Agricultural Income Tax Act without explicit provision. Dismissing Aspinwall appeals, it ruled such benefits require statutory backing and proper notice during amalgamation proceedings.
Actor Vijay appealed before the Madras High Court against a Rs 1.5 crore income tax penalty upheld earlier. The Division Bench is yet to list the matter, following dismissal of his plea by a single judge confirming the penalty’s validity.
The Madras High Court dismissed AIADMK MLA SP Velumani’s challenge to a Rs 7 crore income-tax assessment and penalty. It upheld proceedings under Sections 153C and 271AAC(1), finding no procedural irregularity or violation of natural justice in the case.
The Gujarat High Court set aside a GST appellate order, holding rejection solely for non-appearance without examining merits was illegal. A Bench of A S Supehia and Pranav Trivedi heard the plea.
The Supreme Court dismissed the Income Tax Department’s appeal due to delay, upholding the Delhi High Court order quashing reassessment proceedings against NDTV’s holding company RRPR Holdings. The ruling reinforces that reassessment cannot continue when the main tax claim itself has already been rejected in appellate proceedings.
The Delhi High Court granted partial relief to Huawei Telecommunications (India) by quashing reassessment notice and special audit for 2013–14, while upholding reassessment and audit directions for the 2015–16 assessment year.
Tata Steel Limited has filed a writ petition before the High Court of Jharkhand challenging a GST adjudication order issued by the Commissioner of CGST & Central Excise, Jamshedpur that imposes significant financial liabilities on the company.
The Bombay High Court quashed the seizure of Rs 1 crore by the Directorate General of GST Intelligence, ruling GST officers lack authority to confiscate cash found during searches. The court granted relief to Mumbai trader Smruti Waghdhare.
The Supreme Court of India refused to hear a PIL challenging provisions of the Income Tax Act, 2025 permitting no-notice raids and digital searches, with a bench led by Surya Kant and Joymalya Bagchi.
