Tax Dispute: Fox Mandal & Co Moves Supreme Court of India Against Rs.3.9 Crore Pre-GST Service Tax Demand

Fox Mandal & Co approached the Supreme Court of India challenging a Rs 3.9-crore service tax demand from the pre-GST regime; a bench of PS Narasimha and Alok Aradhe granted two weeks to file missing documents.

Big Relief for Lalit Modi as ITAT Quashes Rs.20 Crore Tax Reassessment

The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal annulled a reassessment order against Lalit Kumar Modi for AY 2010–11 that had raised his taxable income from Rs 54.81 lakh to Rs 20.12 crore, citing unexplained credit card spending, private jet lease and fuel costs, and Golden Wings liabilities.

Income Tax Reassessment Of 2013–14 Quashed, J&K High Court Says: “Clearly Barred By Limitation And Cannot Be Sustained In Law”

The High Court of Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh quashed reassessment proceedings for AY 2013–14 as time-barred. A bench of Justice Sindhu Sharma and Justice Shahzad Azeem set aside orders issued under Income Tax Act, 1961 Sections 148A(d) and 148.

Big Relief for Rajinikanth: CESTAT Sets Aside Service Tax Demand Against Rajinikanth in Property Lease Case

The Chennai Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal set aside a Rs 56 lakh service tax demand against actor Rajinikanth, ruling hotel buildings are exempt from service tax under the Finance Act, 1994 provisions.

Madras High Court Orders Fresh Review of Khazana Jewellery Tax Settlement Over 268 Kg Undisclosed Gold

The Madras High Court directed the Income Tax Settlement Commission to reconsider Khazana Jewellery’s settlement plea involving 268 kg undisclosed gold stock, quashing its 2020 rejection and ordering a fresh review to avert penalties, interest, and prosecution.

Reassessment Based Only on Audit Objection Is Impermissible Review: Delhi High Court

The Delhi High Court held that reassessment initiated solely on an audit objection, despite prior scrutiny, amounted to an impermissible review and clear change of opinion. It ruled the notice was time-barred under Section 149, as inapplicable facts existed.