The Supreme Court ruled that the right to speedy trial under Article 21 of the Constitution of India cannot override strict bail conditions under the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985. It set aside the High Court’s bail order for failing to satisfy mandatory “twin conditions” under Section 37 in a commercial quantity drug case.
The All India Muslim Personal Law Board told the Supreme Court of India that Muslim women are allowed to offer namaz in mosques but cannot demand entry through a specific door. It clarified that while participation is permitted, certain religious discipline and practices must be followed.
The Supreme Court of India granted bail to a man accused of attacking senior advocate Y R Sadasiva Reddy in Bengaluru. The Court noted over one year of custody and ordered release with strict trial court conditions.
Gauhati High Court rejected Pawan Khera’s anticipatory bail, saying the case involves serious charges beyond defamation. The court also stressed the need for custodial interrogation to verify documents and uncover the full conspiracy.
The Central Bureau of Investigation arrested a court reader at Tis Hazari Courts for allegedly taking a bribe to influence a bail order. He was caught red-handed during a trap while accepting ₹20,000, part of a ₹30,000 illegal demand.
The Supreme Court agreed to hear Sajjan Kumar’s appeal against his conviction in the 1984 anti-Sikh riots case and scheduled it for July 2026. His counsel highlighted over 7 years in jail and personal hardships, urging an early hearing.
The Supreme Court refused to intervene in the deletion of election duty officers from West Bengal’s voter list, asking them to approach appellate tribunals. The Court said they may miss voting now, but their “more valuable right” to remain on the electoral rolls will be protected.
The Delhi High Court refused to cancel Ishrat Jahan’s bail, noting no violation of conditions in over four years. Delhi Police’s plea alleging a larger conspiracy behind the 2020 riots was rejected by the Court.
Delhi High Court has asked Himayani Puri to respond to an activist’s plea challenging a gag order over alleged posts linking her to Jeffrey Epstein. The case highlights the clash between free speech and defamation, with the next hearing set for May 7.
A Delhi court has directed the Aam Aadmi Party and its leaders to remove alleged defamatory content targeting BJP MP Bansuri Swaraj. The court said her reputation could suffer “irreparable harm” and restrained further circulation of the posts.
