Supreme Court Upholds Relief to NDTV: Reassessment Against RRPR Holdings Quashed, IT Dept Appeal Dismissed

The Supreme Court dismissed the Income Tax Department’s appeal due to delay, upholding the Delhi High Court order quashing reassessment proceedings against NDTV’s holding company RRPR Holdings. The ruling reinforces that reassessment cannot continue when the main tax claim itself has already been rejected in appellate proceedings.

Consumer Forum Cannot Decide Banking Disputes Involving Fraud, Forgery: Supreme Court On Bank Deposit Cases

The Supreme Court of India ruled consumer forums cannot decide fraud or forgery disputes in banking transactions like unauthorized fixed deposit pledges. Justices PS Narasimha and Manoj Misra said such cases belong in civil or criminal courts.

Tax Dispute: Fox Mandal & Co Moves Supreme Court of India Against Rs.3.9 Crore Pre-GST Service Tax Demand

Fox Mandal & Co approached the Supreme Court of India challenging a Rs 3.9-crore service tax demand from the pre-GST regime; a bench of PS Narasimha and Alok Aradhe granted two weeks to file missing documents.

Judges Citing Fake AI-Generated Judgments Is Not Just an Error, It Amounts to Misconduct: Supreme Court

The Supreme Court of India flagged serious concerns over a trial court’s AI-generated judgment citing non-existent precedents. Justices P.S. Narasimha and Alok Aradhe termed it an institutional issue, issuing notice to the Attorney General, Solicitor General, and Bar Council of India.

Contract Rules Supreme: SC Says CERC Tariff Cap Can’t Override State’s Right to Free Power

The Supreme Court ruled that CERC’s 13% tariff cap does not nullify Himachal Pradesh’s contractual right to 18% free power from JSW Hydro. Contractual obligations prevail over regulatory limits, the Court emphasized.

Govt. Are Not Allowed To Add Clauses In Public-Private Contracts For ‘Unilateral Arbitrator Appointment’: Supreme Court

The Supreme Court ruled that government entities cannot include clauses for unilateral arbitrator appointments in public-private contracts, as these violate Article 14 of the Constitution, undermining fairness. The decision, led by Chief Justice DY Chandrachud, applies to three-member arbitration panels, emphasizing equal treatment and impartiality in the arbitration process.

“What Kind of Plea is This? No Eyes, No Body Part.. Well. Dismissed”: CJI Rejects PIL Against Use of Body Parts as Political Party Symbols

Today, On 5th August, The Supreme Court dismissed a PIL challenging the use of body parts as political symbols, noting the plea’s specific aim at the Indian National Congress hand symbol. The court emphasized the Election Commission’s authority in symbol allocation, affirming the importance of symbols in the electoral process and judicial restraint in such matters, while upholding established norms.

[BREAKING] Same-Sex Marriage | Justice Sanjeev Khanna Recused Himself from the Hearing Citing Personal Reasons

Justice Sanjeev Khanna today recused himself from hearing a review petition on same-sex marriage, leading to the reconstitution of a five-judge constitutional bench by CJI DY Chandrachud. The Supreme Court deferred the hearing, and it was clarified that review petitions are decided in chambers, with no open court hearing. The original judgment denied marriage rights to queer couples.

Supreme Court Rules Non-Signatories Can Be Bound by Arbitration Agreements

In a landmark judgment, the Supreme Court of India has clarified the scope of the “group of companies” doctrine in arbitration, significantly impacting how arbitration agreements are interpreted and enforced. The Court’s decision, delivered by a Constitution Bench comprising Chief Justice DY Chandrachud and Justices Hrishikesh Roy, PS Narasimha, JB Pardiwala, and Manoj Misra, establishes […]

Supreme Court Quashes Speedy Death Penalty in Child Rape-Murder Case

The Supreme Court has set aside the conviction and death sentence of Naveen, a 25-year-old street-dweller, accused of kidnapping, raping, and murdering a three-month-old infant. The apex court highlighted that the accused was not given a “proper opportunity” to defend himself during the trial, which was concluded in a record 23 days from the date […]