The Supreme Court dismissed the Income Tax Department’s appeal due to delay, upholding the Delhi High Court order quashing reassessment proceedings against NDTV’s holding company RRPR Holdings. The ruling reinforces that reassessment cannot continue when the main tax claim itself has already been rejected in appellate proceedings.
Shilpa Shetty secured partial relief as the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ordered fresh examination of her Rs 12.5 crore gift dispute, directing the Assessing Officer to reassess evidence under Section 68 after granting opportunity to establish genuineness.
The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal Chandigarh held that merely claiming funds belong to a Hindu Undivided Family is insufficient without documentary proof of their source, holding, and transfer, in a case involving Rs 50 lakh life insurance purchased from alleged agricultural income.
The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal annulled a reassessment order against Lalit Kumar Modi for AY 2010–11 that had raised his taxable income from Rs 54.81 lakh to Rs 20.12 crore, citing unexplained credit card spending, private jet lease and fuel costs, and Golden Wings liabilities.
The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal held that though gifts from relatives are generally exempt under Section 56(2)(x), exemption fails without proof. In Varun’s case, Rs 10.43 lakh received on his anniversary was taxed due to inadequate evidence of relationship and source.
The Delhi bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal quashed a revision against senior advocate Mukul Rohatgi for AY 2020–21, holding that reopening his Rs 133.46 crore assessment lacked legal basis and could not rest on mere re-inquiry alone.
The Madras High Court held that Section 263 revisionary powers cannot be exercised by misclassifying a demerger as an amalgamation. A Division Bench dismissed the Revenue’s appeal, upholding the ITAT ruling in Tax Case Appeal No. 602 of 2013.
The Delhi High Court ruled that payments to Amazon Web Services for cloud services are not taxable as royalty or technical fees. This judgment benefits global tech firms and Indian startups, affirming that standard cloud services do not grant customers rights or ownership over any technical infrastructure or intellectual property.
Today (12th March): The Delhi High Court has deferred its verdict on the Congress party’s petition seeking a stay on the Income Tax Department’s notice demanding over Rs 105 crore in taxes. The court indicated no apparent flaws in the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal’s ruling. The Congress argued urgency due to the upcoming elections. The party’s frozen accounts were central to the dispute.
