The Allahabad High Court extended protection to a couple who obtained a mutual-consent divorce but later remarried for the sake of their two children, while observing that the institution of marriage should not be treated lightly over trivial disputes.
After examining CCTV footage, the Delhi High Court held that a jail warden’s second round of beating—after inmates had dispersed and returned to their cells—was unnecessary and absolutely impermissible, warning of stern action if such conduct is repeated.
The Supreme Court has appointed former judge Justice Sudhanshu Dhulia to head a judicial commission probing illegal residential colonies at Uldepur in Meerut and directed authorities to proceed against 16,726 unauthorised structures identified in Zone-A.
The Gujarat High Court granted anticipatory bail to five relatives accused of supporting and instigating a husband to pronounce talaq, noting their limited alleged role, absence of criminal antecedents and assurance of cooperation with the investigation.
The Supreme Court has sought an affidavit from the Centre explaining the legal and executive basis for permitting MDR on specified merchant UPI payments above ₹2,000. Notice was issued to the Centre, RBI and NPCI, but the Court declined to stay the framework scheduled to take effect on October 15.
A Supreme Court PIL seeks the interim suspension of Chief Election Commissioner Gyanesh Kumar and a declaration that Election Commission decisions cannot be taken unilaterally. The petition relies on 14 alleged objections recorded by Election Commissioners Sukhbir Singh Sandhu and Vivek Joshi, while seeking production and preservation of the ECI’s institutional records.
The Supreme Court gave the rival Trinamool factions four weeks to complete their affidavits and documents, after which the Election Commission must decide the party name and symbol dispute within three months.
The Supreme Court declined to advance the West Bengal SIR matter despite a request for hearing before the October 6 Nandigram and Rejinagar bypolls. The case remains listed for October 5.
The Supreme Court has directed the Telangana State Bar Council to provisionally enrol as advocates candidates whose three-year LL.B. was completed in the regular mode but whose earlier degrees were obtained by open or distance learning, holding that continued denial of enrolment during the pending appeals would cause avoidable prejudice. The provisional enrolment creates no equity and abides by the final outcome on Rule 5 of the Rules of Legal Education, 2008.
Supreme Court judge Justice Ujjal Bhuyan, who flagged a return of opacity in the collegium system while speaking at the launch of a judicial transparency report
