The Tripura High Court held that senior citizens lacking technological proficiency cannot be penalised for failing to track court cases online. Setting aside a dismissal in a property dispute, the Court emphasised that digital access and technological awareness vary significantly among elderly litigants.
Police in Madhya Pradesh’s Narmadapuram registered an FIR against two unidentified persons for allegedly issuing death threats and making communal remarks against ADJ Tabassum Khan. The threats followed her judgment sentencing 14 men to life imprisonment in a mob lynching case linked to alleged cattle smuggling.
A woman allegedly entered the Varanasi District Judge’s courtroom, occupied the judge’s chair, and refused to leave. The unusual incident created chaos among lawyers, leading to a police response after she reportedly acted like a presiding judge.
The Gauhati High Court dismissed a Regular Second Appeal, reaffirming that a Civil Judge (Junior Division) cannot dissolve a Muslim marriage or authenticate talaq. Only the District Judge can decide matrimonial disputes where no Family Court exists.
A plea has been filed in the Supreme Court against the quashing of the amendment to the MP Higher Judicial Service Rules, stating, “The amendment is not a new recruitment method, but only a conditional adjustment within the framework.”
Delhi Police has told district judges that only formal witnesses may be examined virtually, while material witnesses will continue in physical mode. The letter follows the LG’s notification on evidence dissemination that sparked lawyers’ protests.
Today, 12th August, The Supreme Court, led by CJI BR Gavai, has sent to a Constitution Bench the key question of whether a judicial officer with over 7 years’ Bar experience can be appointed as District Judge under the Bar Vacancy.
Former Nagaland judge Zhimomi, who earlier got anticipatory bail in the related criminal case, moved the Supreme Court for relief in the disciplinary action. The Court refused, saying, “Exonerate yourself, face the proceeding and come out clean.”
Today, On 16th June, The Supreme Court granted anticipatory bail to a retired Nagaland judge who claimed he was maliciously prosecuted and forced to retire after raising questions about missing bail cash and irregularities involving Rs.14.35 lakh in sureties from 29 cases.
In a rare and controversial move, the Rajasthan High Court rejected all candidates considered for promotion to District Judge, sparking serious questions about judicial competence and the promotion system within the subordinate judiciary.
