The Bombay High Court directed HDFC Bank’s Satara branch to provide CCTV footage from December 9, 2024, to District Judge Dhananjay Nikam, accused of soliciting a ₹5 lakh bribe for bail. The footage is key to the bribery probe, with the judge denying all allegations, claiming false implication. The court ordered the footage be handed over within a week, and the matter will be heard next on January 27, 2025.
In light of recent disruptions in the Ghaziabad District Court, the Uttar Pradesh Judicial Service Association (UPJSA) convened an emergency online meeting to discuss mounting concerns about abuse, threats, and vandalism by certain advocates toward judicial officers. The association expressed alarm over an incident in which a group of advocates allegedly pressured, verbally abused, and vandalized the courtroom of the District Judge, Ghaziabad, affecting judicial dignity and morale. The meeting attendees condemned the incident, stressing that such behavior undermines the impartiality and independence of the judiciary.
The Delhi High Court cautioned against frequent case transfers, warning of potential long-term harm to judges’ careers and questioning the fairness and integrity of the judiciary. Emphasizing the need for solid evidence to justify transfers, the court rejected a transfer petition and imposed a fine, underscoring the commitment to judicial fairness and integrity.
The Allahabad High Court mandated the use of video testimony for remote witnesses in cases outside its jurisdiction. It emphasized the importance of technology for efficient legal processes and instructed state authorities to ensure video conferencing facilities are utilized for evidence recording. The court also highlighted the need for coordinated efforts among relevant authorities.