The Supreme Court held that the Section 20 presumption under the Prevention of Corruption Act cannot be drawn unless the initial demand is proved, acquitting two public servants in a 1996 bribe case. New Delhi: The Supreme Court has acquitted a former village Talati-cum-Mantri and a peon in a 1996 bribery case, holding that the […]
Today, On 13th March, The Supreme Court of India told the Lokpal of India it need not follow the Delhi High Court direction for a fresh sanction exercise in the cash-for-query case involving Mahua Moitra. The bench said the interpretation needs closer examination.
India’s top anti-corruption body, Lokpal, faces backlash for paying Rs 50 lakh/month rent at The Ashok Hotel and planning to buy seven Rs 70 lakh BMWs for its members. Critics question the priority of luxury over accountability and justice.
Supreme Court hears challenge to Section 17A of the Prevention of Corruption Act, raising concerns over misuse. Justice Nagarathna warns: “It can protect honest officers — or dishonest ones.”
Today, On 30th July, Supreme Court questioned Justice Yashwant Varma’s conduct, saying, “Chief Justice is not a post office, he also has duties towards the nation,” while examining the constitutional challenge to the in-house procedure for judicial misconduct.
Justice Yashwant Varma’s impeachment process faced a setback after sources said the Rajya Sabha did not accept the motion related to the burnt cash case. Now, the government is expected to bring the motion in the Lok Sabha instead.
Despite one-third of High Court seats lying vacant, the government and opposition are advocating to impeach two judges raising questions about priorities in India’s already burdened judicial system.
The Lokpal of India has dismissed all complaints against former SEBI Chairperson Madhabi Puri Buch regarding the Hindenburg matter, deeming the allegations baseless and speculative. The anti-corruption body found no credible evidence to warrant an investigation, criticizing the complainants for filing frivolous claims aimed at sensationalism.
Today, On 5th May, the Delhi HC scheduled a hearing for AAP leaders Arvind Kejriwal and Manish Sisodia’s pleas against the ED chargesheet in the excise policy case on August 12, challenging the court’s order in the investigation.
A new Rs 2,000 crore Scam case has been filed against AAP leaders Manish Sisodia and Satyendar Jain. The investigation reveals that over 12,000 classrooms were built at inflated costs during their tenure in the Delhi government.
