• Sat. May 30th, 2026
    • '

    Tag: women entry Sabarimala

    Are You the Chief Priest of the Country?: Supreme Court Slams Indian Young Lawyers Association Over Sabarimala Temple PIL
    Are You the Chief Priest of the Country?: Supreme Court Slams Indian Young Lawyers Association Over Sabarimala Temple PIL
    Supreme CourtHeadlines

    Are You Chief Priest of the Country?: Supreme Court Slams Indian Young Lawyers Association Over Sabarimala Temple PIL

    Today, On 5th May, The Supreme Court asked “Are you the chief priest of the country?” while criticising the Indian Young Lawyers Association’s 2006 PIL against restrictions on women aged 10 to 50 entering Kerala’s Sabarimala Temple. The court called the petition amounted to an abuse of process of law.

    author
    Sabarimala Reference Row| We Respect Authors And Thinkers, But Cannot Rely on WhatsApp University: Supreme Court
    Sabarimala Reference Row| We Respect Authors And Thinkers, But Cannot Rely on WhatsApp University: Supreme Court
    Supreme CourtHeadlines

    Sabarimala Reference Row| We Respect Authors And Thinkers, But Cannot Rely on WhatsApp University: Supreme Court

    Today, On 23rd April, The Supreme Court said it respects the views of all distinguished authors and thinkers but cannot rely on information from “WhatsApp University.” The nine-judge Constitution bench made this remark while hearing petitions on discrimination against women and religious freedom issues.

    author
    Sabarimala Row: “Can Constitutional Morality Justify Social Reform Laws?”: Supreme Court Raises Big Question on Religious Freedom
    Sabarimala Row: “Can Constitutional Morality Justify Social Reform Laws?”: Supreme Court Raises Big Question on Religious Freedom
    Supreme CourtHeadlines

    Sabarimala Row: “Can Constitutional Morality Justify Social Reform Laws?”: Supreme Court Raises Big Question on Religious Freedom

    The Supreme Court is examining whether the State can use constitutional morality and Directive Principles to justify laws reforming religious practices. The debate in the Sabarimala reference case may redefine the balance between religious freedom and equality in India.

    author
    “Will the Constitution Not Come to the Rescue?”: Supreme Court Questions Bar on Devotees Touching Deity at Sabarimala Ayyappa Temple
    “Will the Constitution Not Come to the Rescue?”: Supreme Court Questions Bar on Devotees Touching Deity at Sabarimala Ayyappa Temple
    Supreme CourtHeadlines

    “Will the Constitution Not Come to the Rescue?”: Supreme Court Questions Bar on Devotees Touching Deity at Sabarimala Ayyappa Temple

    The Supreme Court raised a key constitutional question on whether devotees can be denied the right to touch a deity based on birth or status. The issue came up during the ongoing hearing in the Sabarimala Ayyappa Temple case on religious freedom and equality.

    author
    “Hardest Task to Call Millions’ Beliefs Wrong”: Supreme Court’s Big Observation in Sabarimala Case
    “Hardest Task to Call Millions’ Beliefs Wrong”: Supreme Court’s Big Observation in Sabarimala Case
    Supreme CourtHeadlines

    “Hardest Task to Call Millions’ Beliefs Wrong”: Supreme Court’s Big Observation in Sabarimala Case

    Supreme Court of India says courts must be careful before questioning religious beliefs of millions in the Sabarimala Temple Entry Case. Bench also warns religion cannot be diluted in the name of social reform and debates scope of judicial review.

    author
    BREAKING | Sabarimala Reference Row | What Was Once Immoral or Obscene Is No Longer Regarded So: Justice B V Nagarathna
    BREAKING | Sabarimala Reference Row | What Was Once Immoral or Obscene Is No Longer Regarded So: Justice B V Nagarathna
    Supreme CourtHeadlines

    BREAKING | Sabarimala Reference Row | What Was Once Immoral or Obscene Is No Longer Regarded So: Justice B V Nagarathna

    During the Supreme Court of India hearing on the Sabarimala Temple issue, Justice Nagarathna highlighted how society’s views on morality have evolved over time. Her remark signals a major constitutional shift in how courts may assess religious practices and gender equality.

    author
    Sabarimala Row: Tushar Mehta Tells Supreme Court: “India… has always treated ladies at a higher pedestal, let us not introduce ‘patriarchy’”
    Sabarimala Row: Tushar Mehta Tells Supreme Court: “India… has always treated ladies at a higher pedestal, let us not introduce ‘patriarchy’”
    Supreme CourtHeadlines

    Sabarimala Row: Tushar Mehta Tells Supreme Court: “India… Has Always Treated Ladies At a Higher Pedestal, Let Us Not Introduce ‘Patriarchy’”

    SG Tushar Mehta told the Supreme Court that India respects women and rejected the idea of patriarchy in the Sabarimala case. The Centre argued temple entry rules are based on religious faith, not gender discrimination, as the court continues hearing the matter.

    author
    Sabarimala Review: Seers’ Body Tells Supreme Court “Courts Not Experts in Religious Faith”, Seeks Role in Hearing
    Sabarimala Review: Seers’ Body Tells Supreme Court “Courts Not Experts in Religious Faith”, Seeks Role in Hearing
    Supreme Court

    Sabarimala Review: Seers’ Body Tells Supreme Court “Courts Not Experts in Religious Faith”, Seeks Role in Hearing

    Akhil Bharatiya Sant Samiti has moved the Supreme Court seeking to intervene in the Sabarimala review case, arguing that courts should not decide essential religious practices. The nine-judge bench will hear the matter on April 7, focusing on the balance between religious freedom and equality.

    author
    We May Have To Cross Some Unforeseen Bridges: Supreme Court 9-Judge Bench To Hear Sabarimala Temple Reference From April 7
    We May Have To Cross Some Unforeseen Bridges: Supreme Court 9-Judge Bench To Hear Sabarimala Temple Reference From April 7
    Supreme CourtHeadlines

    We May Have To Cross Some Unforeseen Bridges: Supreme Court  9-Judge Bench To Hear Sabarimala Temple Reference From April 7

    A Bench of the Supreme Court of India will begin hearings on the Sabarimala Temple review from April 7, examining questions on freedom and entry. Today, Surya Kant, Joymalya Bagchi, and Vipul M. Pancholi asked parties to submit arguments by March 14.

    author