You Mean Judges Are Hot-Headed?, Get Influenced by Movie?: Karnataka HC Questions Actor Darshan’s Plea Against Release of Movie ‘BOSS’

The Karnataka High Court questioned Darshan Srinivas’s claim that the Kannada film BOSS could affect the fairness of his Renukaswamy murder trial. Justice Pradeep Singh Yerur observed that the concern should be possible impact on witnesses and proceedings, not whether judges could be influenced.

Judges Should Not Sit Like a Sphinx, He Must Engage in a Dialogue With the Bar: Madras High Court

The Madras High Court ruled that trial judges must actively participate in proceedings and not remain passive observers. Justices GR Swaminathan and R Poornima restored a money recovery suit, holding that courts must seek clarifications and ensure fair trial principles through judicial engagement.

Pandora’s Box Has Been Opened: Allahabad HC on Supreme Court Judgments On Illegal Arrests and Custody

The Allahabad High Court held that habeas corpus petitions challenging an accused’s initial arrest and remand cannot ordinarily be entertained after cognizance, framing of charges, and substantial progress in trial. “Pandora’s Box Has Been Opened,” the Court remarked on recent illegal-arrest jurisprudence.

Lakhimpur Kheri Violence Case: Supreme Court Expresses Dissatisfaction Over Witness Delay, Orders Lawful Measures For Immediate Attendance

The Supreme Court of India expressed concern over delays in the 2021 Lakhimpur Kheri violence trial, directing lawful measures to secure witnesses’ presence after noting the Uttar Pradesh government failed to explain their non-production before the trial court for nearly two months.

Delhi High Court Rejects Accused Plea in CM Rekha Gupta Assault Case, Allows Trial

Delhi High Court refused to stay trial against accused in alleged assault on Delhi Chief Minister Rekha Gupta. Justice Anup Jairam Bhambhani rejected plea, allowing proceedings, with evidence scheduled to begin April 20.

BREAKING | Railways Land-for-Jobs Scam: Court Frames Charges Against Lalu Prasad Yadav, Rabri Devi, Tejashwi & Others

Today, On 9th January, Rouse Avenue court has formally framed corruption and criminal conspiracy charges against Lalu Prasad Yadav, Rabri Devi, Tejashwi Yadav and several other accused, marking a major development in the high-profile Railway land-for-jobs case.

“Not a Free Man Yet”: Bombay High Court Allows Gautam Navlakha to Shift to Delhi, Imposes Strict Trial Conditions

The Bombay High Court has allowed Elgar Parishad accused Gautam Navlakha to shift from Mumbai to his Delhi residence while making it clear that he must attend trial proceedings whenever required.
The Court imposed strict conditions, including weekly police reporting, surrender of passport, and prior permission to leave Delhi.

IRCTC Scam: Court Slams Lalu Yadav, Rabri Devi & Tejashwi, Frame Charges Ahead of Bihar Polls

In the IRCTC scam case, a Delhi court slammed Lalu Prasad Yadav, Rabri Devi, and Tejashwi Yadav, stating they “engaged in conspiracy and abused their position as public servants” while framing charges of corruption and criminal conspiracy.

RG Kar Financial Irregularities || “A Prompt Trial of Corruption Accused Would Reinforce People’s Faith in Justice”: Calcutta High Court

Today, On 12th February, The Calcutta High Court has said that the RG Kar Hospital financial irregularities case should be handled quickly to keep people’s trust in the courts. This case was filed soon after the rape and murder of a junior doctor at the hospital, which shocked the entire country. The court warned that delayed justice could make people lose faith in the legal system. It has asked the authorities to conduct a fair and fast investigation into the matter.

Supreme Court: “NIA Court Can Continue Trial Against Baramulla MP Engineer Rashid Under UAPA”S

The Supreme Court clarified that the NIA court in Delhi can continue hearing the case of Engineer Rashid. He was arrested in 2019 under the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act (UAPA) in a terror funding case. Rashid remains in jail as an accused in the matter. The ruling affirms the jurisdiction of the NIA court over the proceedings.