Only three High Courts are fully compliant, the Supreme Court has been told, and it now wants a single High Court-wise chart showing where every court and Bar Association stands on sexual harassment committees. New Delhi: Working from the affidavits that every High Court has now filed, the Supreme Court on Thursday, October 15, ordered […]
A Delhi court has issued notice on four women wrestlers’ appeal challenging the acquittal of former WFI chief Brij Bhushan Sharan Singh and co-accused Vinod Tomar in a sexual harassment case. The matter is listed for October 9.
Four women wrestlers have filed an appeal in a Delhi court challenging the acquittal of BJP leader and former Wrestling Federation of India chief Brij Bhushan Sharan Singh, and co-accused Vinod Tomar, in a sexual harassment case. The appeal contends the trial court’s August 3 order was legally unsustainable and rested on ‘archaic and stereotypical assumptions’ about how victims of sexual assault are expected to behave.
The Allahabad High Court held that a workplace sexual harassment complaint under the POSH Act cannot be rejected merely because it was filed late. The Court ruled that authorities must first examine the reasons for the delay before dismissing the complaint.
The Bombay High Court ruled that alleged sexual harassment during travel in shared public transport not arranged by an employer does not fall within the definition of a “workplace” under the POSH Act. Consequently, such incidents cannot be examined through the Act’s workplace harassment framework.
The Bombay High Court said families in India often hesitate to report sexual assault and harassment due to social realities, and delay in filing an FIR alone cannot defeat such complaints. Refusing to quash a 2019 molestation FIR, the Court dismissed a Kerala man’s plea over allegations of outraging his domestic worker’s modesty.
The Supreme Court has reconstituted its Gender Sensitisation & Internal Complaints Committee with Justice B.V. Nagarathna continuing as chairperson. An office order to this effect was issued on Tuesday, and it will come into effect from May 28.
Bombay High Court at Goa held ICC cannot hide instigator of false complaint as unknown source. Justice Neela Gokhale ruled omission unjustified when retraction letter clearly names responsible individual in proceedings.
The Supreme Court has sought detailed status reports from all High Courts on the formation of gender sensitisation committees for women and transgender persons, citing lapses and lack of uniform mechanisms across courts, including district and subordinate levels.
The Allahabad High Court held that a consensual teacher–student relationship amounted to moral misconduct, not sexual harassment, and ruled that dismissal with disqualification was shockingly disproportionate, directing MNNIT to reconsider the punishment.
