The Supreme Court questioned the NIA for repeatedly delaying Shabir Ahmed Shah’s bail hearing in the terror-funding case. The Court fixed the next date as January 7 and made it clear that no further adjournments will be allowed.
The Supreme Court has relaxed V. Senthil Balaji’s strict bail condition, saying he must now appear only when officially summoned. The court noted his flawless compliance for 1.5 years and called the previous requirement unnecessarily burdensome.
The Supreme Court was informed that electoral registration officers have no authority to decide a voter’s citizenship. Petitioners said the Election Commission’s Special Intensive Revision suffered from major lapses and unlawful voter deletions.
Today, On 18th November, The Supreme Court directed the petitioner to file an intervention in the ongoing M.C. Mehta case while hearing concerns over the worsening Delhi air pollution crisis. The bench said this route ensures accountability and faster action on pollution issues.
Today, On 17th November, The Supreme Court granted four weeks to the Centre and other parties to file their responses in the Sahara–Adani asset sale case. The Court adjourned Sahara’s plea and said the matter will be listed again after six weeks.
The Supreme Court has transferred CPI(M)’s challenge to the Madras High Court order directing removal of permanent political flagpoles from public spaces in Tamil Nadu to Justice Vikram Nath’s bench. The party argued the order violates its fundamental rights and amounts to “impermissible judicial legislation.”
The Supreme Court will hear Uddhav Thackeray faction’s plea on November 12 against the Election Commission’s decision granting Shiv Sena’s name and “bow and arrow” symbol to Eknath Shinde. Kapil Sibal warned that any delay could cause “irreparable harm” ahead of 2026 polls.
A writ petition challenges Telangana’s GO granting 42% BC quota in local body elections, saying it breaches the 50% cap set by the Supreme Court. Hearing on Monday.
Today, on 2nd September, On Day 7 of the Presidential Reference hearing, the Supreme Court questioned, “What if the Governor does not follow the timeline?” The Bench examined the consequences of delays in assenting to bills, highlighting executive accountability.
Today, on 2nd September, On Day 7 of the Presidential Reference hearing, the Supreme Court questioned, “What if the Governor does not follow the timeline?” The Bench examined the consequences of delays in assenting to bills, highlighting executive accountability.
