• Sun. Aug 30th, 2026
    • '

    Tag: religious freedom India

    ‘No Need to Attack Judicial Review’: CJI Surya Kant Pushes Back as Sai Deepak Defends Religious Autonomy in Sabarimala Hearing
    ‘No Need to Attack Judicial Review’: CJI Surya Kant Pushes Back as Sai Deepak Defends Religious Autonomy in Sabarimala Hearing
    Supreme CourtHeadlines

    ‘No Need to Attack Judicial Review’: CJI Surya Kant Pushes Back as Sai Deepak Defends Religious Autonomy in Sabarimala Hearing

    The Supreme Court of India bench led by Surya Kant questioned arguments by J. Sai Deepak against judicial review of codified religious practices. The CJI stressed that once the State acts, courts cannot be completely excluded from reviewing its actions, even in matters of faith.

    author
    “Will the Constitution Not Come to the Rescue?”: Supreme Court Questions Bar on Devotees Touching Deity at Sabarimala Ayyappa Temple
    “Will the Constitution Not Come to the Rescue?”: Supreme Court Questions Bar on Devotees Touching Deity at Sabarimala Ayyappa Temple
    Supreme CourtHeadlines

    “Will the Constitution Not Come to the Rescue?”: Supreme Court Questions Bar on Devotees Touching Deity at Sabarimala Ayyappa Temple

    The Supreme Court raised a key constitutional question on whether devotees can be denied the right to touch a deity based on birth or status. The issue came up during the ongoing hearing in the Sabarimala Ayyappa Temple case on religious freedom and equality.

    author
    ‘Not Good for Hinduism’: Supreme Court of India Warns Against Excluding Devotees from Temples in Sabarimala Hearing
    ‘Not Good for Hinduism’: Supreme Court of India Warns Against Excluding Devotees from Temples in Sabarimala Hearing
    Supreme CourtHeadlines

    ‘Not Good for Hinduism’: Supreme Court of India Warns Against Excluding Devotees from Temples in Sabarimala Hearing

    The Supreme Court observed that restricting temple entry to specific denominations could harm Hinduism’s inclusive nature. The remark came during the ongoing Sabarimala reference, raising key questions on religious freedom and equality.

    author
    BREAKING | Sabarimala Reference Row | What Was Once Immoral or Obscene Is No Longer Regarded So: Justice B V Nagarathna
    BREAKING | Sabarimala Reference Row | What Was Once Immoral or Obscene Is No Longer Regarded So: Justice B V Nagarathna
    Supreme CourtHeadlines

    BREAKING | Sabarimala Reference Row | What Was Once Immoral or Obscene Is No Longer Regarded So: Justice B V Nagarathna

    During the Supreme Court of India hearing on the Sabarimala Temple issue, Justice Nagarathna highlighted how society’s views on morality have evolved over time. Her remark signals a major constitutional shift in how courts may assess religious practices and gender equality.

    author
    Sabarimala Case: Centre’s 10 Big Arguments in Supreme Court That Could Redefine Religious Freedom in India
    Sabarimala Case: Centre’s 10 Big Arguments in Supreme Court That Could Redefine Religious Freedom in India
    Supreme CourtHeadlines

    Sabarimala Case: Centre’s 10 Big Arguments in Supreme Court That Could Redefine Religious Freedom in India

    The Centre has urged the Supreme Court to limit judicial interference in religious practices and rethink key doctrines like “constitutional morality” and essential religious practices. Its 10-point submission could significantly reshape how courts handle faith, PILs, and religious rights in India.

    author
    Sabarimala Row: Tushar Mehta Tells Supreme Court: “India… has always treated ladies at a higher pedestal, let us not introduce ‘patriarchy’”
    Sabarimala Row: Tushar Mehta Tells Supreme Court: “India… has always treated ladies at a higher pedestal, let us not introduce ‘patriarchy’”
    Supreme CourtHeadlines

    Sabarimala Row: Tushar Mehta Tells Supreme Court: “India… Has Always Treated Ladies At a Higher Pedestal, Let Us Not Introduce ‘Patriarchy’”

    SG Tushar Mehta told the Supreme Court that India respects women and rejected the idea of patriarchy in the Sabarimala case. The Centre argued temple entry rules are based on religious faith, not gender discrimination, as the court continues hearing the matter.

    author
    Sabarimala Row Back in Spotlight: Supreme Court Begins Hearing on Women’s Entry & Religious Freedom Clash
    Sabarimala Row Back in Spotlight: Supreme Court Begins Hearing on Women’s Entry & Religious Freedom Clash
    Supreme CourtHeadlines

    Sabarimala Row Back in Spotlight: Supreme Court Begins Hearing on Women’s Entry & Religious Freedom Clash

    A nine-judge bench of the Supreme Court has started hearing key petitions on women’s entry into religious places, including Sabarimala Temple. The case will decide the balance between gender equality and religious freedom under Articles 25 and 26 of the Constitution.

    author
    No Need to Get Prior Permission on Private Prayer Meetings in Homes: Chhattisgarh High Court
    No Need to Get Prior Permission on Private Prayer Meetings in Homes: Chhattisgarh High Court
    High CourtLatest news

    No Need to Get Prior Permission on Private Prayer Meetings in Homes: Chhattisgarh High Court

    The Chhattisgarh High Court held that individuals cannot be stopped from conducting prayer meetings in their own homes as lawful property owners. “There is no such law restraining any persons… no need to get prior permission,” the Court affirmed, emphasizing legality and civil rights protection.

    author
    Sabarimala Review: “Courts Must Not Decide What Is Essential Religious Practice,” Muslim Personal Law Board Tells Supreme Court
    Sabarimala Review: “Courts Must Not Decide What Is Essential Religious Practice,” Muslim Personal Law Board Tells Supreme Court
    Supreme CourtHeadlines

    Sabarimala Review: “Courts Must Not Decide What Is Essential Religious Practice,” Muslim Personal Law Board Tells Supreme Court

    The Muslim Personal Law Board told the Supreme Court that courts should not decide the “essential religious practices” of any religion. The 9-judge Bench will hear the Sabarimala review case from April 7, 2026, on the scope of religious freedom under Articles 25 and 26.

    author
    We May Have To Cross Some Unforeseen Bridges: Supreme Court 9-Judge Bench To Hear Sabarimala Temple Reference From April 7
    We May Have To Cross Some Unforeseen Bridges: Supreme Court 9-Judge Bench To Hear Sabarimala Temple Reference From April 7
    Supreme CourtHeadlines

    We May Have To Cross Some Unforeseen Bridges: Supreme Court  9-Judge Bench To Hear Sabarimala Temple Reference From April 7

    A Bench of the Supreme Court of India will begin hearings on the Sabarimala Temple review from April 7, examining questions on freedom and entry. Today, Surya Kant, Joymalya Bagchi, and Vipul M. Pancholi asked parties to submit arguments by March 14.

    author