The Delhi High Court sentenced actor Rajpal Yadav to three months’ simple imprisonment in seven cheque bounce cases for repeatedly breaching settlement undertakings. The Court also directed him to pay Rs 7.35 crore in compensation, while his wife was fined over Rs 5 lakh in each case.
The Karnataka High Court ruled that prosecution under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act cannot continue against a former director when a cheque was issued after the company’s dissolution. The Court held that a dissolved company lacks legal existence, making such cheques legally unenforceable.
The Delhi High Court refused to grant more time to actor Rajpal Yadav and directed him to surrender by 4 PM in a cheque bounce case. The Court said there was “no ground to show leniency” after repeated failures to honour payment assurances.
The Delhi High Court has directed Bollywood actor Rajpal Yadav to surrender after he repeatedly failed to honour settlement commitments in multiple cheque bounce cases. The Court said there was no reason to continue leniency after repeated breaches of undertakings given before it.
The Karnataka High Court quashed a rape FIR against an advocate, finding the woman’s claim of sexual relations on a false promise of marriage was manipulated. Citing an imprint of manipulation and an attempt to convert discord into public prosecution.
The Delhi High Court held that a director who is an admitted signatory to a dishonoured cheque cannot seek quashing of NI Act proceedings by merely claiming resignation, especially when the timing and genuineness of resignation are disputed facts.
The Supreme Court has ruled that cheque bounce complaints under Section 138 NI Act must be filed only in the court where the payee’s bank home branch is located, clarifying jurisdiction after the 2015 amendment and preventing forum shopping.
The Calcutta High Court has ruled that a company’s name change does not invalidate cheque bounce proceedings under Section 138 of the NI Act. The judgment confirms that criminal liability continues despite corporate renaming.
Ex-CJI D.Y. Chandrachud responded to Sanjeev Sanyal, asserting that the judiciary is not a roadblock to Viksit Bharat, while emphasizing, “Expeditious disposal of cases is the key to the preservation of the rule of law,” ensuring transparency and certainty.
Supreme Court rules that a typographical error is no defence; cheque bounce complaint is invalid if the demand notice shows a wrong cheque amount, clarifying legal procedures and liabilities.
