• Wed. Jun 17th, 2026
    • '

    Tag: judiciary recruitment

    BREAKING| Practice Condition Must Remain, Only Issue Is the Modalities: Supreme Court Reaffirms 3-Year Experience Rule for Judicial Service
    BREAKING| Practice Condition Must Remain, Only Issue Is the Modalities: Supreme Court Reaffirms 3-Year Experience Rule for Judicial Service
    Supreme CourtHeadlines

    BREAKING| Practice Condition Must Remain, Only Issue Is the Modalities: Supreme Court Reaffirms 3-Year Experience Rule for Judicial Service

    Today, On 13th March, The Supreme Court of India reaffirmed the mandatory three-year practice rule, with the CJI stressing that the condition must remain while its implementation needs refinement. He also questioned passive practice and suggested free legal aid work as experience.

    author
    BREAKING| Practice Is Important, But The Impact On Young Talent Matters Too: Supreme Court On 3-Year Practice Rule For Judicial Service
    BREAKING| Practice Is Important, But The Impact On Young Talent Matters Too: Supreme Court On 3-Year Practice Rule For Judicial Service
    Supreme CourtHeadlines

    BREAKING| Practice Is Important, But The Impact On Young Talent Matters Too: Supreme Court On 3-Year Practice Rule For Judicial Service

    Today, On 26th February, The Supreme Court raised concerns over the three-year practice requirement for entry-level judicial service, especially its impact on women aspirants. The Chief Justice said, “No doubt practice is important, but we also have to see the impact on young talent.”

    author
    Breaking: ‘This Will Open Pandora’s Box’: SC Refuses to Let Judges Take Fresh Judicial Exams, Upholds 3-Year Law Practice Rule
    Breaking: ‘This Will Open Pandora’s Box’: SC Refuses to Let Judges Take Fresh Judicial Exams, Upholds 3-Year Law Practice Rule
    Supreme CourtHeadlines

    Breaking: ‘This Will Open Pandora’s Box’: Supreme Court Refuses to Let Judges Take Fresh Judicial Exams, Upholds 3-Year Law Practice Rule

    The Supreme Court refused to modify its verdict, keeping the three-year law practice requirement for eligibility in judicial services exams. Serving judges cannot use their experience to appear for fresh exams in other states.

    author