“Violence Against A Child Cannot Be Taken Lightly”: Supreme Court Orders Protection For 14-Year-Old In CJP Protest Case

The Supreme Court said allegations of intimidation and violence involving a 14-year-old girl linked to the CJP protests cannot be taken lightly, and directed immediate action on the FIR she has lodged, along with police protection for her and her family. New Delhi: The Supreme Court on Thursday observed that allegations of intimidation and violence […]

Pellet Guns, Police Surveillance: Supreme Court Told Constitutional Questions From Student Protests Are Outside Committee’s Remit

Even as the High-Powered Committee begins its fact-finding, the Supreme Court was reminded that the weightier constitutional questions from the student protests, the legality of pellet guns and of police data-collection through private companies, must be decided by the Court itself, since a fact-finding body cannot rule on constitutional validity. New Delhi: As the Supreme […]

Student Protest Case: Supreme Court Shields Vulnerable Witnesses, Orders Dedicated Helpline And Confidentiality Safeguards

Hearing the student-protest matter, the Supreme Court stopped a vulnerable witness from speaking in open court because the proceedings were being live-streamed, and directed that such witnesses receive protection no less than that given to protected witnesses in judicial proceedings, including a dedicated helpline. New Delhi: The Supreme Court on Thursday took special care to […]

Student Protest Probe: Supreme Court Says High-Powered Committee Will Report Directly To It, Declines To Change Composition

The Supreme Court made clear that the High-Powered Committee probing alleged police excesses against student protesters will report directly to it without any government intermediary, declined to alter the Committee’s composition, and set out the procedure it will follow. New Delhi: The Supreme Court on Thursday made clear that the High-Powered Committee (HPEC) it constituted […]

Time Has Come To Adopt Doctrine Of ‘Superior Responsibility’ For Bureaucrats: Allahabad HC Tells UP Government

The Allahabad High Court observed that the State should adopt the doctrine of “superior responsibility,” holding senior bureaucrats accountable, and in appropriate cases criminally liable, for failing to prevent or punish misconduct by subordinates, stressing stronger administrative accountability and governance reforms.

Aravalli Row: Supreme Court Forms High-Powered Expert Panel To Re-examine Definition

The Supreme Court has constituted a high-powered expert committee to independently review the Centre’s report on the definition and delineation of the Aravalli hill range. The panel has been tasked with examining and resolving critical ambiguities identified in the report’s findings.

NEET-UG Paper Leak Row| PM Modi Is Personally Monitoring It: Centre Tells Supreme Court

The Centre told the Supreme Court that Prime Minister Narendra Modi is personally monitoring the government’s response to the NEET-UG paper leak controversy. Talking about the cancellation decision, it said he is overseeing every step taken very carefully.

Supreme Court Halts UP Govt’s Banke Bihari Ordinance – Appoints Ex-High Court Judge to Lead Temple Management Panel

The Supreme Court has stayed the Uttar Pradesh government’s ordinance giving it control over Vrindavan’s Banke Bihari temple and formed a 12-member panel headed by retired Justice Ashok Kumar to manage its affairs. The move aims to end years of mismanagement and provide better facilities for devotees.

Allahabad High Court Orders Committee to Examine Online Gaming & Betting Regulation: “Fantasy Sports in India Lie in a Legal Grey Area”

The Allahabad High Court has ordered the formation of a committee to examine regulations for online gaming and betting. It observed, “Fantasy sports in India lie in a legal grey area” between skill and chance.

Bombay HC Orders Full Reimbursement for Retired Govt Officer’s Heart Transplant at Private Hospital

The Bombay High Court ruled in favor of a retired central government officer denied reimbursement for a heart transplant at a private hospital. The court emphasized that the patient’s right to choose a hospital during critical medical conditions is paramount, ordering full payment within four weeks, citing violations of fundamental rights.