The Delhi High Court upheld a Family Court order directing a DNA test, ruling that a child’s right to know biological parentage outweighs an adult’s concern over reputation. The Court observed that truth cannot be suppressed merely because it causes personal discomfort.
The Rajasthan High Court dismissed a husband’s plea seeking narco-analysis, polygraph and DNA tests in a divorce dispute. Justice Sanjeet Purohit upheld the family court order, ruling that such tests were unnecessary, delayed, and could not be imposed without consent.
The Supreme Court dismissed a mother’s appeal against the Delhi High Court’s refusal of maintenance for her daughter, holding that scientific evidence prevails over legal presumptions. It ruled that “a man cannot be directed to pay maintenance if a DNA test disproves fatherhood.”
The Andhra Pradesh High Court ruled that a husband cannot demand DNA tests of his children to prove his wife’s alleged adultery. The Court stressed that children cannot be used as tools in marital disputes and their rights must be protected.
The Madhya Pradesh High Court has ruled that a DNA test may be ordered in divorce proceedings where the objective is to prove alleged adultery and not to question a child’s legitimacy. The Court emphasized sufficient pleadings of non-access and the need to balance privacy with justice.
A Delhi family court has ruled that a divorced woman proven to be living in adultery is not entitled to maintenance under Section 125(4) CrPC. The court relied on a DNA test and prior divorce judgment to dismiss her plea.
The Karnataka High Court ruled that DNA tests can’t be ordered on mere demand, stressing strict legal justification to protect privacy, dignity, legitimacy, and fundamental rights.
Bombay High Court rules that suspicion of a wife’s adultery is no ground for forcing a minor to undergo a DNA test, prioritizing the child’s rights and welfare in paternity disputes.
The Allahabad High Court ruled that a man denying paternity must undergo a DNA test or pay child maintenance. Emphasizing the children’s rights, the court highlighted the importance of securing their financial support and legal status. The ruling addressed the significance of DNA testing in resolving paternity disputes and emphasized the children’s best interests.
Today (26th April): A Mumbai court rejected the plea for a DNA test on BJP candidate Ravi Kishan, accused of fathering a woman’s daughter. The woman, Aparna Soni, claims Ravi Kishan is the father of her 25-year-old daughter, Shinova, and seeks a paternity test. Ravi Kishan denies the allegations, and his wife has filed an FIR against the woman and her family.
