The Delhi High Court ruled that social media influencers can critique consumer brands, provided their opinions are backed by scientific evidence. The court dismissed San Nutrition’s bid to halt negative reviews about its whey protein products, emphasizing the importance of free speech and public access to information on health-related matters.
The District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission in Lucknow ruled against Vishal Mega Mart for unfair trade practices after they charged a customer Rs. 18 for a carry bag without consent. The store must refund the amount, pay interest, and compensate the customer for harassment, highlighting the importance of customer approval in such charges.
Consumer rights are an important part of today’s society, designed to protect people from unfair practices and make sure they get the goods and services they pay for. But sometimes, consumers face problems with a product or service and may need to take legal action. In such cases, “filing a consumer case in a consumer court” becomes essential. In today’s digital world, consumers are exposed to many products and services. Sometimes, they may face issues with these goods or services. In these situations, “filing a consumer case” is a legal way to get justice. It allows you to raise your complaints and seek a solution, whether it’s getting a refund, compensation, or fixing the problem.
The Supreme Court emphasized that the railways are a key part of the country’s infrastructure, and any attempts to disrupt the ticketing system must be firmly stopped. Highlighting the importance of a smooth and secure system, the court urged strong measures to prevent such threats. The railways play a crucial role in connecting the nation and supporting its economy. Safeguarding its ticketing system is vital to ensuring efficiency and public trust.
The Supreme Court denied the Competition Commission of India’s request to transfer cases involving Amazon and Flipkart to a division bench, emphasizing adherence to procedural rules. Justice Oka highlighted the importance of not providing special treatment to litigants. The cases are set for a hearing on December 17 in the Karnataka High Court.
![[Tirupati Laddu Row] "We Can't Direct a Separate State for Every Temple": SC Dismisses Petition for CBI Probe](https://i0.wp.com/lawchakra.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/PIL-filed-in-Supreme-Court-seeking-SIT-probe-into-Tirupati-laddu-controversy.png?resize=447%2C367&ssl=1)
The Supreme Court rejected a petition by activist K.A. Paul for a CBI investigation into alleged adulteration of Tirupati Laddu, citing the impracticality of creating separate states for religious matters. Previous claims of animal fat usage in the laddus caused political conflict, with ongoing investigations managed by a Special Investigation Team.
A Bengaluru consumer court ordered Dilmil Matrimony to pay Rs. 60,000 to Vijaya Kumar for failing to provide a suitable match for his son despite receiving Rs. 30,000. The court found the site did not fulfill its obligations or demonstrate effort in service, constituting unfair trade practices and a breach of consumer trust.
![[Lawyer on the Spot (LOTS)] "Tailored Solutions for Challans, Theft & Accidents": App Launched to Provide 24X7 Legal Assistance to Private Vehicle Owners](https://i0.wp.com/lawchakra.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/img-3-1.png?resize=447%2C367&ssl=1)
A new mobile app, ‘Lawyer on the Spot (LOTS) 24X7,’ has launched to provide private vehicle owners with around-the-clock legal assistance. Developed by ‘Lawyered,’ it offers instant legal consultations, accident reporting aid, document generation, and support for traffic violations. This cost-effective app aims to ensure accessible legal help whenever needed.