“Opposite Party is Duty Bound to Share Details”: Consumer Court Orders Matrimony Site to Pay Rs.60k for Failing to Find Match

A Bengaluru consumer court ordered Dilmil Matrimony to pay Rs. 60,000 to Vijaya Kumar for failing to provide a suitable match for his son despite receiving Rs. 30,000. The court found the site did not fulfill its obligations or demonstrate effort in service, constituting unfair trade practices and a breach of consumer trust.

[Lawyer on the Spot (LOTS)] “Tailored Solutions for Challans, Theft & Accidents”: App Launched to Provide 24X7 Legal Assistance to Private Vehicle Owners

A new mobile app, ‘Lawyer on the Spot (LOTS) 24X7,’ has launched to provide private vehicle owners with around-the-clock legal assistance. Developed by ‘Lawyered,’ it offers instant legal consultations, accident reporting aid, document generation, and support for traffic violations. This cost-effective app aims to ensure accessible legal help whenever needed.

Coldplay Concert: Lawyer Files Complaint Against BookMyShow & Live Nation

Amit Vyas, representing Coldplay fans in India, has filed a criminal complaint with Mumbai’s Economic Offences Wing against BookMyShow and Live Nation, alleging ticketing fraud for the band’s upcoming concerts. He claims unethical practices and manipulation enabled ticket bots to thrive, depriving genuine fans of access and leading to inflated resale prices.

Kerala Consumer Court Awards Rs 17.83 Lakh to Actor Harisree Ashokan for Defective Tiles in His ‘Punjabi House’

Kerala Consumer Court has awarded Mollywood actor Harisree Ashokan Rs 17.83 lakhs in compensation for defective tiles in his home, ‘Punjabi House.’ The court emphasized the impact of consumer complaints on individuals’ lives and the importance of being informed about product standards. Ashokan’s frustration and mental distress highlight consumer vulnerability in facing negligence.

“Insurance Companies Rejecting Claims on Baseless Grounds”: Punjab Consumer Forum Asks IRDA to Step In

The Punjab State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission highlights widespread unfair claim rejections by insurance companies, urging regulatory action to protect customers from harassment. The Commission’s careful examination of a case involving HDFC ERGO and HDFC Bank led to a ruling in favor of the complainant, emphasizing the need for fair treatment and transparency.

SC Upholds Consumer’s ‘Right to Know’ Product Quality Under ‘Right to Health’

The Supreme Court of India recently upheld the consumer’s right to health and quality product information in advertising. Justices directed advertisers to submit a self-declaration form confirming compliance with the Advertising Code before advertising. The court emphasized the importance of protecting consumers and urged the relevant ministries to establish a consumer complaint system.

Patanjali Row | SC Orders Removal of Patanjali Ads, Suspends Sales of Restricted Products

Today(on May 7th), Supreme Court addresses Patanjali’s misleading online ads, emphasizes accountability and consumer protection. Demands action and plan from Patanjali while stressing suspension of sales for products with revoked licenses.

“Mercy for One, But What About the Rest”: SC Plight of Faceless Individuals Relying on Misleading Medication

On Wednesday (10th April): The Supreme Court of India expressed concern for public well-being, particularly regarding misleading advertisements and unregulated products. Justices emphasized that violations of the law, such as exploiting people’s trust with misleading claims, will not be tolerated. This relates to a recent contempt plea against Patanjali for marketing its product, Coronil, as a COVID-19 cure, violating drug advertising regulations.

Kolkata Restaurant Fined for Overcharging on Beer and Water

On Monday (1st April): The Marco Polo restaurant in Kolkata has been fined for overcharging on beer and water. The District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission imposed a penalty for violating Maximum Retail Price (MRP) regulations and service charge rules. The complainant was awarded a refund, mental distress compensation, and litigation charges, as the commission ruled in her favor.