Supreme Court Closes 18-Year Loophole, Restores Power of Consumer Forums to Enforce All Orders

The Supreme Court has ruled that consumer forums can enforce all their orders like civil court decrees, ending an 18-year gap caused by a 2002 amendment. The judgment ensures consumers get real justice and not just “paper victories.”

Delhi High Court to Restaurants: Why Charge Service Fee When You Already Hike MRP?

Delhi High Court questioned restaurants for levying service charges despite already charging above MRP for food and drinks. The bench said ambience and service are included in the inflated prices, calling the extra charge unfair.

PIL in Supreme Court: “20% Ethanol-Blended Petrol Will Damage Vehicles, Leave Consumers Helpless”

A PIL challenges the rollout of E20 petrol, warning it harms engines, cuts fuel efficiency, and leaves consumers without insurance cover. The plea seeks ethanol-free petrol, labelling, and consumer protection.

Denied Mediclaim Over Google Timeline? Gujarat Forum Says That’s No Excuse!

An insurer rejected a man’s mediclaim citing mismatched Google Timeline data. The consumer forum ruled in the patient’s favour, calling the reason false and ordering full payment with interest.

SpiceJet Ordered to Pay Rs 25,000 for Issuing Wrong Ticket to Senior Citizen

The Mumbai Consumer Court has ruled against SpiceJet for negligent behavior, ordering the airline to pay Rs 25,000 to a senior citizen. The airline issued incorrect tickets during flight rescheduling in 2020, causing mental distress and financial loss to the passenger. The case highlights the legal responsibility of service providers.

Lawyer Sues Gucci in Consumer Court Over Defective Shoes: “Luxury Brand Caused Injury, Mental Trauma”

A lawyer has filed a consumer court case against Gucci, alleging that defective shoes caused him to slip and suffer injuries. He claims the luxury brand caused physical harm, mental trauma, and failed in customer service.

Bengaluru Man Duped by Fake Lucky Draw, Wins Rs 1.95 Lakh Refund from Travel Firm

A Bengaluru court ruled that Fala Holidays must refund Rs 1.5 lakh, plus interest and compensation to Hafeez Pasha, misled by a fake lucky draw offer. After persistent pressure to buy a costly membership without service, Pasha sought justice through the Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, which found the company guilty of unfair practices.

Supreme Court Slams Senior Advocate, Plea to Quash Cheating Case Rejected: ‘Shocking! You Acted Like a Land Broker’

The Supreme Court strongly criticised a 69-year-old senior advocate for cheating someone of Rs.1.68 crore by pretending to be a land broker. Rejecting his plea to quash the case, the Court said, “Shocking! You acted like a land broker.”

Kerala High Court Admits PIL Against High Multiplex Ticket Prices Over Dynamic Pricing

A PIL in the Kerala High Court challenges the arbitrary pricing of multiplex movie tickets, highlighting consumer exploitation through dynamic pricing models without regulatory oversight. Filed by Advocate Manu Nair, the petition argues for government intervention under existing cinema laws, citing disparities with other Indian states that have implemented price controls. A hearing is scheduled for July 1.

Supreme Court Upholds Pecuniary Jurisdiction Provisions in Consumer Protection Act, 2019: “Jurisdiction Should Be Based on Price Paid, Not Compensation Sought”

The Supreme Court has upheld the validity of the Consumer Protection Act, 2019 provisions, ruling that pecuniary jurisdiction must be based on the actual amount paid for goods or services, not the compensation claimed.