Mandatory Service Charge Without Consent Is Illegal: Lawyer Wins Rs.15,000 After Challenging Rs.151 Restaurant Fee

The Jalandhar Consumer Commission directed a restaurant to pay Rs 15,000 compensation to a lawyer after finding that a mandatory service charge of Rs 151.53 was added without consent. The forum held that such automatic charges amount to an unfair trade practice.

PIN Code Missing Is No Excuse: Consumer Court Fines Postal Department for 62-Day Delay in Delivering Money Order to Widow

The Consumer Commission in Chhatrapati Sambhajinagar held postal authorities liable for delaying money transfer to an 80-year-old retired man’s widowed sister. The Commission ordered Rs 3,000 compensation and Rs 2,000 costs for hardship caused.

Paid For Airtel 5G, Got Only ‘E’ Network: Consumer Wins Rs 592 Recharge Refund And Compensation

A consumer court ordered Airtel to refund Rs.592 and pay Rs.5,000 compensation after a customer paid for 5G services that were never provided. Rejecting Airtel’s defence, the court noted the company failed to prove it had ever personally verified the complainant’s handset.

Constitutes Unfair Trade Practice: Consumer Commission Orders KSBC To Pay Rs.25,000 Compensation For Charging Rs 10 extra For Beer Bottle

The Pathanamthitta Consumer Commission directed KSBC to compensate a customer for charging more than the printed MRP on a beer bottle. Holding the practice to be an unfair trade practice and deficiency in service under the Consumer Protection Act, the Commission awarded refund, compensation, and costs totaling Rs 25,000.

Dead Fly In Biryani!!: Consumer Commission Orders Compensation  And Ten Free Plates For Customer

The Puducherry Consumer Commission held a restaurant guilty of deficiency in service after a customer found a dead fly in a plate of biryani. The Commission ordered compensation for mental distress and directed the restaurant to provide ten plates of fresh Hyderabadi chicken biryani free of cost.

Consumer Commission Ordered FirstCry To Compensate Customer For Arbitrary Order Cancellation And Labelling Him ‘Fraud User’

A District Consumer Commission directed FirstCry to compensate a customer after finding that it arbitrarily cancelled an order, withheld payment, and labelled the customer a “fraud user” without inquiry or due process. The Commission ordered refund with interest and compensation for mental distress.

Physics Wallah Penalised: Consumer Court Orders Rs.50K Compensation for Denying Student Access to Paid NEET Coaching

The Baramulla Consumer Commission held Physics Wallah guilty of service deficiency for denying NEET course access despite payment, ordering refund of Rs 35,000, Rs 50,000 compensation for academic loss, and Rs 10,000 litigation costs to the affected student

Insurance Companies Cannot Deny Valid Claims by Wrongly Using Exclusion Clauses: District Commission Slams Insurer for Deficiency in Service

The District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (East), Delhi held Star Health and Allied Insurance Co. Ltd. liable for deficiency in service after wrongly rejecting Anuradha Narang’s health insurance claim, ruling that incidental diagnoses cannot justify denial when treatment was for a covered illness.

Court Registry Not a ‘Service Provider’, Consumer Forum Has No Power to Review Judicial Administration: Mumbai Consumer Commission

The South Mumbai Consumer Commission ruled that court registries do not provide commercial services under consumer law. It held that delays in supplying certified copies relate to judicial administration and cannot be examined by consumer forums.