On a PIL flagging delays in child sexual abuse probes, the Delhi High Court has directed the Commissioner of Police to decide within three months on a proposal for dedicated POCSO investigation teams in every police district of the capital. New Delhi: The Delhi High Court has directed the Commissioner of Delhi Police to take […]
The Allahabad High Court has held that the arrest of an accused who is already in custody in another case is a fresh arrest, so the grounds of that arrest must be communicated to him under Article 22(1) of the Constitution and Section 48(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. Lucknow: The Allahabad High […]
The Karnataka High Court has granted bail to accused No.10 in a Belagavi murder case, who is alleged to have issued a tampered report from the government scientific agency, holding that whether he assisted in tampering with the report is a matter for trial.
The Delhi High Court has dismissed Ankit Kumar Singh’s plea to quash an FIR and POCSO proceedings, holding that the victim’s present choice, their September 2025 marriage and their child cannot retrospectively supply legal consent to sexual intercourse during her minority, and leaving him free to approach the Supreme Court under Article 142.
The Delhi High Court has dismissed Annu Garg’s revision seeking a higher interim maintenance than the Rs 15,000 a month fixed by the Family Court, holding that bank transactions cannot, without examining their nature and source, be treated as the husband’s monthly disposable income, and that maintenance is not a fixed percentage of income.
The Supreme Court has held that cognizance on a protest complaint filed under the CrPC was taken only when the Special Judge found a prima facie case on June 3, 2026, after the BNSS came into force, and that the accused therefore had to be heard first under the proviso to Section 223 BNSS.
The Delhi High Court refused urgent listing of a plea questioning whether Section 223 of the BNSS applies to ED complaints filed before July 1, 2024. The matter will now be heard on April 1, 2026, with the key legal issue still undecided.
The Punjab and Haryana High Court dismissed a plea seeking transfer of a 2019 defamation case, holding that unproven allegations against a judge and counsel amount to an “attack on the majesty of law.” The Court imposed a Rs 50,000 penalty on the 89-year-old petitioner and directed the trial court to proceed expeditiously.
The Delhi High Court criticised a trial judge for failing to deliver a verdict five months after reserving judgment, noting repeated scheduling without pronouncement. Justice Swarana Kanta Sharma remarked, “Judicial proceedings cannot oscillate between readiness and uncertainty.”
Delhi High Court has issued new practice directions to fast-track cheque bounce case disposal, following the Supreme Court’s Sanjibji Tari judgment, introducing digital summons, QR code and UPI payment options, and stricter timelines to reduce pendency across Delhi courts.
