Change Of Religion Does Not By Itself End Scheduled Tribe Status, But Continuing Tribal Identity Must Be Proved: Allahabad High Court

The Allahabad High Court accepted that conversion does not automatically extinguish Scheduled Tribe status, which remains a question of fact, but dismissed a woman’s petitions after finding she had not produced material showing continuing Bhuiyan customs, community participation and acceptance on the dates of three land purchases.

Presence Of FSSAI In Delhi Cannot Confer Jurisdiction Over A Notice Issued In Maharashtra: Delhi High Court Dismisses VIMAL Elaichi Maker’s Plea

The Delhi High Court dismissed a writ petition by the master licensee of the VIMAL brand challenging a show cause notice issued by the Maharashtra FDA to three brand ambassadors, holding that neither the location of FSSAI in Delhi nor the petitioner’s own base there could confer territorial jurisdiction. The merits were left untouched.

Existence Of Waqf Tribunal No Absolute Bar To Article 226 When Board’s Own Action Is Challenged: Karnataka High Court Quashes 11-Month Ad-Hoc Committee

The Karnataka High Court at Dharwad held that the availability of a remedy before the Waqf Tribunal does not bar writ jurisdiction where the challenge is to the legality of the Waqf Board’s own action, and quashed an official memorandum constituting an eleven-month ad-hoc committee in place of the mechanism under Rule 54 of the Karnataka Wakf Rules, 2017.

Street Vendors Should Not Sell Pan Masala, Gutka Near Schools Where Young Children Are Studying: Delhi High Court

The Delhi High Court held that street vendors cannot sell pan masala, gutka, or similar products near schools where young children study. The ruling came while hearing Suresh Shah’s plea seeking protection to continue vending peacefully near Nizamuddin Railway Station in South Delhi.

An Unnatural Death in Custody Is Not a Private Act, State Responsibility Does Not End Even if Death Is by Suicide: Delhi HC

The Delhi High Court awarded Rs 18.44 lakh compensation to the father of a 19-year-old who died in police custody, holding the State constitutionally liable. The Court ruled that custodial deaths, including suicide, reflect a failure of the State’s duty to protect life.

Disputed Custody Matters Cannot Be Decided Through Habeas Corpus, Family Court Is The Appropriate Forum: Delhi HC Rejects Mother’s Plea

The Delhi High Court dismissed a mother’s habeas corpus plea seeking custody of her four-year-old daughter living with father in Singapore. The Court held disputed international custody matters should be decided by Family Court, not writ jurisdiction.

Delhi HC Has Territorial Jurisdiction to Hear CAPF Cases Even If Cause of Action Arose Elsewhere: Supreme Court

The Supreme Court held that BSF and other CAPF personnel can approach the Delhi High Court in service-related disputes even if the cause of action arose outside Delhi. The Court said jurisdiction exists because the Union Government and force headquarters are located in the national capital.

Allahabad High Court Orders CBI, ED to Examine Disproportionate Assets Allegations Against Rahul Gandhi

The Allahabad High Court asked the Central Bureau of Investigation and the Enforcement Directorate to verify a complaint alleging that Congress leader Rahul Gandhi holds assets disproportionate to his known income, directing agencies to examine the accusations.

Orders Passed By Judges In Matters Outside Roster Assigned By Chief Justice are Illegal: Orissa High Court

Orissa High Court held that orders passed by a Bench in matters outside the roster assigned by the Chief Justice are per se illegal. The Court said entertaining cases beyond allocation amounts to jurisdiction without authority, rendering such decisions fundamentally invalid.

Why This Step-Motherly Treatment To Article 226 Jurisdiction?: CJI Surya Kant On Runaway Couple Plea Before Supreme Court

Today, On 20th March, The Chief Justice of India asked the lawyer to move the Delhi High Court after a runaway couple’s protection plea was mentioned before the Supreme Court of India. He questioned, “Why this step-motherly treatment to Article 226 jurisdiction?”