• Wed. May 13th, 2026
    • '

    Tag: advocate

    SHOCKING!! Delhi High Court Advocate Dies By Suicide After Jumping From 15th Floor In Connaught Place Hotel
    SHOCKING!! Delhi High Court Advocate Dies By Suicide After Jumping From 15th Floor In Connaught Place Hotel
    High CourtHeadlines

    SHOCKING!! Delhi High Court Advocate Dies By Suicide After Jumping From 15th Floor In Connaught Place Hotel

    A 26-year-old Delhi High Court advocate, Rajesh Singh, reportedly died after allegedly jumping from the 15th floor of a Connaught Place hotel in New Delhi. Police said they have begun investigating the circumstances surrounding his tragic death today.

    author
    Noble Profession of Advocacy Cannot Be Tarnished: Gujarat HC Denies Bail to Law Student Posing as Advocate
    Noble Profession of Advocacy Cannot Be Tarnished: Gujarat HC Denies Bail to Law Student Posing as Advocate
    High CourtLatest news

    Noble Profession of Advocacy Cannot Be Tarnished: Gujarat HC Denies Bail to Law Student Posing as Advocate

    The Gujarat High Court dismissed anticipatory bail to a law student accused of impersonating an advocate and misappropriating around Rs.80 lakh from multiple victims. The Court remarked, “It transpires that a noble profession of advocacy cannot be allowed to be tarnished.”

    author
    Violation Of Fundamental Rights: Advocate Moves HC Against Maharashtra Govt’s Cancellation Of 5% Muslim Quota
    Violation Of Fundamental Rights: Advocate Moves HC Against Maharashtra Govt’s Cancellation Of 5% Muslim Quota
    High CourtLatest news

    Violation Of Fundamental Rights: Advocate Moves HC Against Maharashtra Govt’s Cancellation Of 5% Muslim Quota

    Advocate has moved the High Court challenging the Maharashtra government’s cancellation of the 5% Muslim quota, calling the decision unjustified. The plea alleges state is practicing racial discrimination against the Muslim community, violating fundamental rights guaranteed under Constitution of India.

    author
    BREAKING| Supreme Court Takes Suo Motu Action on Aravalli Hills Definition: Case Listed Before CJI Surya Kant Bench
    BREAKING| Supreme Court Takes Suo Motu Action on Aravalli Hills Definition: Case Listed Before CJI Surya Kant Bench
    Legal updatesHeadlines

    Supreme Court’s Aravalli Hills Definition: Advocate Urges CJI to Review, Warns ‘100-Metre Test’ May Dilute Protection

    Supreme Court’s recent definition of the Aravalli Hills has come under scrutiny. Advocate Hitendra Gandhi urged the Chief Justice of India to review the ruling, warning that the ‘100-Metre Test’ may weaken critical environmental protections.

    author
    Delhi High Court Cancels Bail of Advocate Accused of Raping a Woman Lawyer, Misusing Influence Through Judges
    Delhi High Court Cancels Bail of Advocate Accused of Raping a Woman Lawyer, Misusing Influence Through Judges
    High CourtHeadlines

    Delhi High Court Cancels Bail of Advocate Accused of Raping a Woman Lawyer, Misusing Influence Through Judges

    The Delhi High Court revoked the anticipatory bail of a 51-year-old lawyer accused of repeatedly raping a junior advocate and trying to influence her via two judicial officers. Justice Amit Mahajan also ordered an administrative inquiry against the involved judges.

    author
    Baseless Complaint Against Advocate: Supreme Court Fines Bar Council of Maharashtra and Goa Rs 50,000
    Baseless Complaint Against Advocate: Supreme Court Fines Bar Council of Maharashtra and Goa Rs 50,000
    Supreme CourtHeadlines

    Baseless Complaint Against Advocate: Supreme Court Fines Bar Council of Maharashtra and Goa Rs 50,000

    Today, On 24th September, The Supreme Court imposed a Rs 50,000 fine on the Bar Council of Maharashtra and Goa for pursuing a baseless complaint against an advocate. The judgment emphasizes accountability and discourages frivolous legal actions by regulatory bodies.

    author
    Centre Notifies Appointment of Justice PB Bajanthri as New Chief Justice of Patna High Court
    Centre Notifies Appointment of Justice PB Bajanthri as New Chief Justice of Patna High Court
    Legal updatesLatest news

    Centre Notifies Appointment of Justice PB Bajanthri as New Chief Justice of Patna High Court

    The Centre has notified the appointment of Justice PB Bajanthri as the new Chief Justice of Patna High Court. The Supreme Court Collegium had recommended his name for the position earlier on September 11, 2025.

    author
    Supreme Court Rejects Challenge to J&K Judge Recruitment Without 3-Year Practice Rule: “No Impact on Old Recruitment Notices”
    Supreme Court Rejects Challenge to J&K Judge Recruitment Without 3-Year Practice Rule: “No Impact on Old Recruitment Notices”
    Supreme CourtHeadlines

    Supreme Court Rejects Challenge to J&K Judge Notification Without 3-Year Practice Rule: “No Impact on Old Recruitment Notices”

    Today, On 28th July, The Supreme Court has dismissed a plea challenging the J&K Civil Judge notification that didn’t include the 3-year practice rule, clarifying that its earlier judgment will apply only prospectively with “no impact on old recruitment notices.”

    author
    Supreme Court Declines Plea to Transfer Waqf Act Case from Delhi HC: "Petitions Now Filed Only for Newspapers"
    Supreme Court Declines Plea to Transfer Waqf Act Case from Delhi HC: "Petitions Now Filed Only for Newspapers"
    Supreme Court

    Supreme Court Declines Plea to Transfer Waqf Act Case from Delhi HC: “Petitions Now Filed Only for Newspapers”

    The Supreme Court rejected a request to shift the Waqf Act case from Delhi High Court, remarking, “Petitions are nowadays being filed only for the newspapers” and questioned the urgency behind rushing to court.

    author
    "3-Year Practice Rule: SC Reserves Verdict on MP Civil Judge Recruitment – Will Ineligible Candidates Be Excluded?"
    "3-Year Practice Rule: SC Reserves Verdict on MP Civil Judge Recruitment – Will Ineligible Candidates Be Excluded?"
    Supreme CourtHeadlines

    Review Petition In Supreme Court Challenges 3-Year Practice Rule for Judicial Exams: “Violating Principles of Fairness and Article 14”

    Today, On 16th June, A review petition has been filed in the Supreme Court challenging the verdict on the 3-year practice rule for judicial exams, stating that “immediate enforcement violates Article 14 & 16” and causes unfair retrospective exclusion.

    author