The Madras High Court ruled that advocates have no vested or fundamental right to demand out-of-turn listing of pending cases. Dismissing a lawyer’s plea, the Court held that only genuinely urgent matters may receive priority through established judicial procedures and exceptional listing protocols.
The Allahabad High Court held that an advocate’s bank account cannot be fully frozen merely because it receives client funds or shows suspicious transactions. The Court ruled that professional fees paid to a lawyer cannot be treated as “proceeds of crime.”
TMC MP Kalyan Banerjee urged the Calcutta High Court Bar Association to intervene after a CID officer allegedly called him seeking permission to interrogate him in a criminal case. Banerjee claimed the move threatened his professional independence and the sanctity of legal practice.
The Telangana Government brought the Telangana Advocates Protection Act, 2026 into force, establishing a stronger legal framework to protect advocates from threats, harassment, intimidation and attacks linked to professional duties, while promoting fearless legal practice and strengthening the independence of the legal profession.
The Supreme Court has issued notice to the Union government, all States, and Union Territories on a petition seeking uniform nationwide guidelines to protect women advocates visiting police stations, especially during late evening and night hours, ensuring their safety, dignity, and protection.
The Madhya Pradesh High Court held that advocates operating offices from their residences cannot be charged commercial electricity tariffs, observing that the legal profession differs fundamentally from trade or business activities since legal practice does not involve buying, selling or commercial trading of goods or services.
The Supreme Court refused to entertain the lawyer’s SLP and questioned his conduct, asking how he could have two children born two months apart. The Bench remarked that such acts undermine credibility and do not merit equitable relief.
The Delhi High Court refused a plea by Ramesh Chandra Singh seeking BCD seat reservation for junior lawyers, noting he contested elections despite knowing the Bar Council of Delhi policy beforehand.
The Supreme Court ruled that a lawyer cannot be accused of criminal intimidation merely for being present while discharging professional duties like giving legal advice. Vague allegations without clear intent to cause alarm are not enough to attract Section 506 of the IPC, the Court held.
Supreme Court to hear if magistrate approval should be mandatory before summoning lawyers in probes. Move follows ED’s controversial summons to senior advocates in ESOP case.
