![[Breaking] ED Reveals Rs 45 Crores Traced and Digital Evidence in Manish Sisodia's Bail Plea Before Supreme Court](https://i0.wp.com/lawchakra.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/image-56.png?resize=447%2C367&ssl=1)
The Supreme Court today has scheduled a hearing on August 5 for Manish Sisodia’s bail plea in the liquor policy case. Sisodia, a former Delhi Deputy Chief Minister, has been in jail for 16 months. The case involves alleged corruption in the liquor policy and implicates the Aam Aadmi Party and its leader Arvind Kejriwal.
In a recent interview, Senior Advocate Dr. Abhishek Singhvi, a distinguished politician and constitutional expert, shared his insights on various pressing issues related to personal liberty, the judicial system, and recent legislative changes in India. This analysis delves into the key points discussed, providing a comprehensive understanding of the topics covered.
Singhvi is emerging as a go-to lawyer for opposition leaders facing legal challenges. He secured interim relief for Kejriwal in a money laundering case and has successfully represented other high-profile politicians, highlighting inconsistencies and lack of evidence. His growing reputation makes him a key figure for opposition parties in legal battles against investigative agencies.
![[Breaking] BCI Seeks Suspension of New Criminal Laws Amid Nationwide Protests](https://i0.wp.com/lawchakra.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/MicrosoftTeams-image-123-300x181-1.webp?resize=300%2C181&ssl=1)
Today, On 26th June, The Bar Council of India urged the suspension of new criminal laws amid nationwide protests, emphasizing the need for careful reconsideration due to public dissent. Legal experts have expressed serious concerns about the potential threats to fundamental rights and democratic principles. The BCI plans to engage with the government and appeal for temporary halting of protests for dialogue.
Supreme Court Justice Vikram Nath reaffirmed the ban on senior lawyers arguing cases during vacation sessions. He emphasized his authority, instructing senior lawyers to let their juniors argue and jokingly advised juniors not to pay seniors for hearing. This rule aims to provide juniors with more opportunities for experience during vacation hearings.
![[Empowering Junior Lawyers] SC Stresses Significance of Junior Lawyers in Vacation Bench Arguments](https://i0.wp.com/lawchakra.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/image-7-1.png?resize=447%2C367&ssl=1)
Today, On 20th May, The Supreme Court emphasized the need for junior lawyers to argue before vacation benches. This allows them to gain experience and advance professionally. The Court urged senior lawyers to support this initiative, highlighting the importance of providing opportunities for young legal professionals. Emphasis was also placed on the role of senior lawyers in mentoring and training junior members of the legal profession.
During a Supreme Court hearing, senior advocate Abhishek Manu Singhvi humorously declined to offer solicitor general Tushar Mehta an internship under him. The hearing involved an original suit by the West Bengal government against the Centre concerning CBI investigations without state consent. Solicitor General Mehta emphasized the importance of Article 131, stating that the CBI operates independently from the Union of India.
Today(on 20th April), Himachal Pradesh High Court has issued a notice to BJP leader Harsh Mahajan in response to a petition filed by Congress leader Abhishek Manu Singhvi challenging the Rajya Sabha elections. This comes after Singhvi contested the “draw of lots” method used to determine the outcome of the elections, resulting in Mahajan’s victory. The matter is scheduled for a hearing on May 23, 2024.
![[BREAKING] K Kavitha Bail Plea | Delhi HC Seeks ED Response](https://i0.wp.com/lawchakra.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/MicrosoftTeams-image-4.png?resize=447%2C360&ssl=1)
K. Kavitha, a prominent political figure, has been denied interim bail in connection with the Delhi Excise Policy case. She is accused of involvement in a bribery scheme and tampering with evidence. The Enforcement Directorate opposes her bail plea, citing potential influence on the case, witness tampering, and evidence destruction. Kavitha’s legal team emphasizes the need for emotional support for her son during exams.