![[Empowering Junior Lawyers] SC Stresses Significance of Junior Lawyers in Vacation Bench Arguments](https://i0.wp.com/lawchakra.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/image-7-1.png?resize=447%2C367&ssl=1)
Today, On 20th May, The Supreme Court emphasized the need for junior lawyers to argue before vacation benches. This allows them to gain experience and advance professionally. The Court urged senior lawyers to support this initiative, highlighting the importance of providing opportunities for young legal professionals. Emphasis was also placed on the role of senior lawyers in mentoring and training junior members of the legal profession.
During a Supreme Court hearing, senior advocate Abhishek Manu Singhvi humorously declined to offer solicitor general Tushar Mehta an internship under him. The hearing involved an original suit by the West Bengal government against the Centre concerning CBI investigations without state consent. Solicitor General Mehta emphasized the importance of Article 131, stating that the CBI operates independently from the Union of India.
Today(on 20th April), Himachal Pradesh High Court has issued a notice to BJP leader Harsh Mahajan in response to a petition filed by Congress leader Abhishek Manu Singhvi challenging the Rajya Sabha elections. This comes after Singhvi contested the “draw of lots” method used to determine the outcome of the elections, resulting in Mahajan’s victory. The matter is scheduled for a hearing on May 23, 2024.
![[BREAKING] K Kavitha Bail Plea | Delhi HC Seeks ED Response](https://i0.wp.com/lawchakra.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/MicrosoftTeams-image-4.png?resize=447%2C360&ssl=1)
K. Kavitha, a prominent political figure, has been denied interim bail in connection with the Delhi Excise Policy case. She is accused of involvement in a bribery scheme and tampering with evidence. The Enforcement Directorate opposes her bail plea, citing potential influence on the case, witness tampering, and evidence destruction. Kavitha’s legal team emphasizes the need for emotional support for her son during exams.
Congress leader Abhishek Manu Singhvi Today (April 6th) challenged the interpretation of draw of lots rules in the high court after losing the Rajya Sabha election from Himachal Pradesh. Singhvi questioned the decision to declare the person selected in the draw as the loser, emphasizing the lack of legal basis. He highlighted the potential need for correction if his arguments hold merit.
Today (1st April): The Income Tax Department has assured the Supreme Court that it will not take coercive action against the Congress party until July 2024, considering the Lok Sabha elections. This decision follows the Congress party’s claim of approximately Rs 3500 crore demand by the Income Tax Department, with no intention to recover Rs 1700 crore before the polls.
![[BREAKING] Excise Policy Case: Delhi HC Sets Arvind Kejriwal's Plea Against ED Summons on September 9](https://i0.wp.com/lawchakra.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/MicrosoftTeams-image-6-1.png?resize=447%2C367&ssl=1)
Delhi High Court to decide on Arvind Kejriwal’s plea against his arrest in a money laundering case related to the Delhi Excise Policy scam at 4:30 PM today. Kejriwal’s legal counsel argued against the arrest’s necessity and emphasized political implications. The court will issue notices and hear arguments on his interim release. The decision is set for 4:30 PM.
A local court in Delhi today ordered the preservation of CCTV footage at the request of Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal. He sought the removal of a Delhi Police officer, alleging misconduct during a court appearance. Despite the allegations, the court ruled to place Kejriwal under the custody of the Enforcement Directorate until March 28 in relation to the Delhi excise policy scandal. Kejriwal’s lawyer questioned the timing of his arrest and the ED’s motives. The ED accused Kejriwal of being involved in bribery through the liquor policy and managing proceeds of crime in the Goa election campaign. Kejriwal’s defense emphasized the lack of direct evidence against him and questioned the ED’s actions. They highlighted the significance of this case as the first instance of a sitting Chief Minister being arrested in India, expressing concerns about its impact on democracy.
Delhi’s Rouse Avenue Court granted Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal privileges during his six-day Enforcement Directorate custody, allowing family visits, medical treatment, and a special diet. Kejriwal is linked to the liquor policy case, facing allegations of kickbacks and manipulation. The legal battle holds broader implications for the Indian political and judicial landscape.
