[Defamation Case] Apex Court Stays Proceedings Against New Delhi CM Atishi, Arvind Kejriwal

NEW DELHI: On Monday(30th Sept), the Supreme Court stayed the proceedings in a criminal defamation case against Delhi Chief Minister Atishi and former Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal, which was initiated due to comments regarding the purported removal of voters’ names from the electoral rolls in the national capital.

[Rajya Sabha Election Loss] ‘Setback’ for BJP MP Harsh Mahajan: HC Rejects Objections to Abhishek Manu Singhvi plea

Today(16th Sept), The Himachal Pradesh High Court has dismissed BJP MP Harsh Mahajan’s objections to Congress leader Abhishek Manu Singhvi’s petition challenging Mahajan’s Rajya Sabha election. Singhvi, who later secured a seat from Telangana, contends that the election process was flawed after both candidates received equal votes and a draw of lots was used to decide the winner.

Muda Scam|| “Sanction Given by the Governor was ‘without Application of mind’, Prosecution Should be Set Aside Against CM Siddaramaiah” : Snr Adv Abhishek Manu Singhvi|| Hearing Adjourned to Sept 2

The Karnataka High Court extended the interim order preventing trial court proceedings against Chief Minister Siddaramaiah. The court adjourned the hearing of Siddaramaiah’s petition challenging the Governor’s order to September 2. Arguments and counterarguments were presented to address the prosecution sanction, with concerns raised about alleged fraud and improper land transfers.

[Breaking] Apex Court Upheld Delhi LG “Not Duty Bound” by Delhi Govt. Cabinet Advice for Appointment of Aldermen to MCD

The Supreme Court oday upheld the Lieutenant Governor’s authority to unilaterally appoint aldermen to the Municipal Corporation of Delhi, overriding the state cabinet’s advice. The judgment favored the LG’s power, derived from the Delhi Municipal Corporation Act, and signified a setback for the AAP-led Delhi government’s influence over the MCD’s functioning.

[Breaking] Excise Policy Case: Manish Sisodia’s Bail Plea, SC Adjourned Hearing Till August 5

The Supreme Court today has scheduled a hearing on August 5 for Manish Sisodia’s bail plea in the liquor policy case. Sisodia, a former Delhi Deputy Chief Minister, has been in jail for 16 months. The case involves alleged corruption in the liquor policy and implicates the Aam Aadmi Party and its leader Arvind Kejriwal.

“Personal Liberty, Judicial Independence & Legislative Reforms are Critical Pillars of Justice”: Dr. Abhishek Singhvi

In a recent interview, Senior Advocate Dr. Abhishek Singhvi, a distinguished politician and constitutional expert, shared his insights on various pressing issues related to personal liberty, the judicial system, and recent legislative changes in India. This analysis delves into the key points discussed, providing a comprehensive understanding of the topics covered.

Snr Adv. Abhishek Singhvi Has Become Go-to Lawyer for Politicians Like Arvind Kejriwal?

Singhvi is emerging as a go-to lawyer for opposition leaders facing legal challenges. He secured interim relief for Kejriwal in a money laundering case and has successfully represented other high-profile politicians, highlighting inconsistencies and lack of evidence. His growing reputation makes him a key figure for opposition parties in legal battles against investigative agencies.

BCI Seeks Suspension of New Criminal Laws Amid Nationwide Protests

Today, On 26th June, The Bar Council of India urged the suspension of new criminal laws amid nationwide protests, emphasizing the need for careful reconsideration due to public dissent. Legal experts have expressed serious concerns about the potential threats to fundamental rights and democratic principles. The BCI plans to engage with the government and appeal for temporary halting of protests for dialogue.

“Senior Lawyers Not Allowed to Argue in my Court”: SC Justice Vikram Nath

Supreme Court Justice Vikram Nath reaffirmed the ban on senior lawyers arguing cases during vacation sessions. He emphasized his authority, instructing senior lawyers to let their juniors argue and jokingly advised juniors not to pay seniors for hearing. This rule aims to provide juniors with more opportunities for experience during vacation hearings.