A contempt petition in the Supreme Court alleges that Delhi Metro station closures and train cancellations ahead of the October 10 protest violate the Court’s October 9 order. The allegations are untested.
Senior Advocate Kapil Sibal and Solicitor General Tushar Mehta exchanged sharp remarks in the Supreme Court during the hearing on curbs on Delhi trains, Metro and internet ahead of the October 10 protest. The contentions are untested.
Solicitor General Tushar Mehta told the Supreme Court that Delhi has not been shut down and that a complete stoppage may be proportionate depending on circumstances. The submissions are untested.
Chief Justice of India Surya Kant asked why the plea against Delhi train, Metro and internet curbs was not taken to the Delhi High Court. The Court expressed no view on the merits.
The microphones went off during the Supreme Court hearing on curbs on Delhi trains, Metro and internet ahead of the October 10 protest, prompting Senior Advocates Kapil Sibal and Gopal Sankaranarayanan to flag it. The CJI responded in the affirmative.
The Supreme Court has recorded that there shall be no complete prohibition on movement of metro and trains in Delhi ahead of the October 10 protests, after the Solicitor General agreed to ask authorities to reconsider. The merits of the protest and the curbs were not decided.
The Supreme Court has heard the Kashmyr vodka trademark dispute between Piccadily Agro Industries and Radico Khaitan Ltd, with Justice Joymalya Bagchi asking what Kashmyr has got to do with vodka. New Delhi: The Supreme Court heard the dispute over the KASHMYR vodka mark between Piccadily Agro Industries and Radico Khaitan Ltd, during which Justice […]
The Supreme Court’s seven-judge Bench has closed the legislative privileges reference arising from the 2003 N. Ravi case as infructuous, since the Tamil Nadu Assembly resolution was withdrawn in 2004, leaving the questions of law open.
Hearing West Bengal’s challenge to Milan Pradhan’s interim bail on the eve of the Nandigram bypoll, the Supreme Court told the State to let the Congress candidate contest, and adjourned the matter to October 7 after Justice Joymalya Bagchi recused himself. New Delhi: The Supreme Court on Monday adjourned the West Bengal government’s plea challenging […]
The Supreme Court of India agreed to urgently hear TVK MLA R Seenivasa Sethupathi’s plea challenging the Madras High Court order restraining him from voting or participating in Tamil Nadu Assembly floor tests, after Senior Advocate Abhishek Manu Singhvi sought urgent listing before CJI Surya Kant.
