Prime Minister Narendra Modi announced fast-track courts for paper leak cases, assuring swift trials and stringent punishment. He reaffirmed that protecting students’ welfare and future remains the government’s top priority, warning that those jeopardising youth will face strict action.
Prime Minister Narendra Modi announced that the Centre has decided to establish fast-track courts to secure swift and stringent punishment in cases involving examination paper leaks, as the student agitation in the national capital over the alleged NEET-UG leak entered a more volatile phase.
The announcement, made in a post on X, drew immediate and sharply worded responses from the Leader of the Opposition and from the Cockroach Janta Party (CJP), the collective leading the protest, neither of whom accepted it as an answer to their demands.
The Prime Minister said the welfare and future of the country’s youth is the government’s foremost priority, and that he had directed the authorities and officials concerned to take all necessary steps on the issue of paper leaks.
Framing the measure as one in a continuing series of steps aimed at safeguarding the interests of students, he added a warning,
“Those who try to harm the future of our youth will not be spared.”
Fast-track courts are not a new species of tribunal but designated sessions or magisterial courts assigned to dispose of specified categories of cases on a compressed timeline, established by State governments in consultation with the respective High Courts.
India has previously deployed them for offences against women and children, and their efficacy has historically turned less on the label than on whether they are given dedicated judges, staff and prosecutorial support rather than being loaded on top of an existing docket.
The announcement also has to be read alongside the Public Examinations (Prevention of Unfair Means) Act, 2024, the central legislation already on the statute book to deal with organised cheating and leaks in public examinations.
Critics of that Act including the Supreme Court Bar Association’s President, Senior Advocate Dr. Vikas Singh, in his recent letter to the Prime Minister have argued that it lacks a time-bound investigative or trial mechanism, a standardised investigation procedure, and provisions addressing repeat offenders, money trails or confiscation of property.
To that extent, the proposal for fast-track courts speaks directly to one of the criticisms levelled at the existing framework, namely the absence of any statutory timeline for trial.
The announcement came a day after Union Health Minister J.P. Nadda said the Centre was open to discussions with all stakeholders on the paper leak issue.
Nadda told a press conference that a meeting with representatives of the protesting CJP had been held in a cordial atmosphere, and said the government had urged activist Sonam Wangchuk to end his hunger strike and join what he described as the mainstream dialogue process.
Leader of the Opposition Rahul Gandhi rejected the announcement, contending that the Union government had itself inflicted the greatest damage on the prospects of young people and had shielded those responsible for repeated failures in the examination system.
He said,
“You are the one who has harmed the future of our youth the most,”
Gandhi maintained that the promise of fast-track courts was an inadequate response for students who had already borne the consequences of successive leaks.
He reiterated a set of demands the removal of Union Education Minister Dharmendra Pradhan, an apology to students, and action against those who assaulted protesters the last a reference to the police action during the CJP-led march to Parliament on July 20. He also pressed for a stronger anti-leak law, structural reform of the examination system, and compensation for students whose careers were derailed by cancelled or compromised examinations.
Congress President Mallikarjun Kharge also criticised the government’s handling of the issue.
ALSO READ: Cockroach Janta Party Protests: Delhi High Court to Hear Plea Seeking NIA Probe
Responding to the Prime Minister’s statement, the CJP reiterated its central demand that Dharmendra Pradhan resign, indicating that the announcement did not alter the course of the agitation.
Separately, the collective alleged on Thursday that the Delhi Police had positioned a badly damaged vehicle outside its protest venue at Jantar Mantar, and questioned publicly why the vehicle had been brought there.
Additionally, The Supreme Court recently heard a public-interest petition requesting the adoption of a standard procedure for investigating paper leaks, along with time-bound inquiries and fast-track trials. The Court raised concerns about how widely worded the requested relief was, and postponed the case for one week.