The controversy about the alleged demolition of a Lord Hanuman temple at the Chief Justice’s residence in the Madhya Pradesh High Court has taken a new turn. The High Court Registrar General has firmly denied these claims, calling them misleading and false. The statement was issued to clear up the misinformation around the issue. However, the matter continues to attract public attention and discussion.
Indore: The controversy over the alleged demolition of a Lord Hanuman temple at the Chief Justice’s residence in the Madhya Pradesh High Court has taken a fresh turn.
Registrar General Dharminder Singh firmly denied the claims, calling them “misleading and entirely false.”
He stated that the Public Works Department (PWD) investigated the matter thoroughly and confirmed that no temple ever existed on the bungalow premises.
This statement came after the High Court Bar Association demanded a detailed investigation by the Chief Justice of India.
However, Singh emphasized that the PWD’s findings had resolved the issue, making further inquiries unnecessary.
The Bar Association, however, strongly criticized the Registrar General’s response. Its President, Dhanya Kumar Jain, dismissed the statement as “meaningless” and “lacking substantial facts.” He reiterated the demand for a review by the Chief Justice of India, questioning the impartiality of the PWD’s investigation.
Jain also highlighted the judiciary’s hierarchy, suggesting a potential conflict of interest since the Registrar General reports to the Chief Justice. He called for an independent and transparent review to address public concerns and ensure accountability. The debate continues, with both sides standing firm on their positions, emphasizing the need for a resolution to uphold judicial integrity.
The temple in question is said to hold historical significance, having been a part of the daily lives of several notable judges of the Madhya Pradesh High Court.
Judges like Justice Bobde, Justice Khanwilkar, and Justice Hemant Gupta, who later became Supreme Court judges, reportedly prayed at this temple. Its importance goes beyond being a religious site; it symbolizes the judiciary’s respect for tradition and spirituality.
Read Also: MP HC Refuses to Recognise High Court Advocates Bar Association
The complaint notes that all Chief Justices of the Madhya Pradesh High Court have shown respect for the temple. During the tenures of Chief Justices Rifat Alam and Rafiq Ahmed, staff members regularly prayed there without any objections from these judges, demonstrating a commitment to harmony and mutual respect for spiritual practices.
The bungalow, along with the temple, is government property. The temple has been renovated with public funds, reinforcing its status as a community asset. It serves as a spiritual space for many employees, primarily those following Sanatan Dharma, allowing them to practice their religion close to their workplace. Any demolition of the temple without proper authorization would disrespect the sentiments of many who value it.