The Supreme Court of India sought replies on a PIL demanding 30% reservation for women lawyers in government legal panels. The plea stated, “The systemic exclusion of women from these panels is not merely an issue of professional inequity but a constitutional lapse that impedes the realisation of substantive equality,”.
The Supreme Court of India ruled that a professionally qualified woman pursuing her career and securing stability for her child cannot amount to cruelty or desertion in marriage, criticising lower court observations as “regressive,” “ultra-conservative” and reflective of a “feudalistic” mindset.
Justice BV Nagarathna questioned whether menstruation being termed a taboo is an objective fact or subjective perception, observing that such views depend on belief systems and that religious understanding should be based on a devotee’s perspective rather than an outsider’s interpretation.
The Supreme Court Bar Association’s report, “Documenting Voices of Women Legal Professionals in India,” surveyed 2,604 female lawyers nationwide, highlighting persistent gender bias. 81% feel their career path is tougher than male colleagues, and 34% report workplace discrimination.
Former Chief Justice of India N. V. Ramana said the government lacked intent to achieve gender parity despite women forming forty percent of trial court judiciary. He said, “Government showed casual attitude appointing women judges in higher courts.”
A 16-year-old girl has approached the Supreme Court seeking to cancel her child marriage, stating she “wants to study.” She urged the court to protect her right to education and personal freedom.
The Supreme Court has issued seven crucial directions to ensure better implementation of the Domestic Violence Act. Despite being in force for over 20 years, the Court observed the law is still not uniformly applied across India.
The Supreme Court of India has mandated a 30% reservation for women lawyers in the Gujarat Bar Associations, including the treasurer role, advocating for gender equality in legal leadership. This decision, stemming from a petition by lawyer Meena A. Jagtap, seeks to enhance women’s representation and address systemic disparities in the profession.
Justice B V Nagarathna addressed the evolving family structure in India, highlighting challenges within the legal system. Factors such as women’s financial independence and urbanization influence this change. She emphasized the need for mutual understanding in partnerships to resolve conflicts and noted that societal attitudes towards women must evolve to reduce family disputes and court cases.
Today, 11th December, the Supreme Court overturned a Telangana High Court ruling regarding a dowry harassment case against Atul Subhash and his family. It emphasized the misuse of legal provisions to target innocent individuals amidst marital disputes. The ruling followed Atul’s tragic suicide, highlighting the need for careful judicial handling of such sensitive accusations.
