Can police lock out a husband’s mother and sisters because he is avoiding the court? Under the Domestic Violence Act, the Supreme Court has held, they cannot be ousted from the shared household merely because he fails to appear, and it ordered the attachment of their home to be lifted forthwith. New Delhi: A house […]
The Uttarakhand High Court has set aside a trial court order that closed a completely blind POCSO accused’s chance to cross-examine the first prosecution witness, and directed that he be given a Braille copy of her examination-in-chief. The Court expressed no view on the merits.
The Supreme Court Collegium has approved the appointment of Justice Subhash Upadhyay, currently an Additional Judge, as a Permanent Judge of the Uttarakhand High Court, confirming a judge with domain expertise in service law who was elevated to the Bench in May 2025. New Delhi: The Supreme Court Collegium has approved the proposal for the […]
Justice Alok Kumar Verma resigned as a Judge of the Uttarakhand High Court, with the Union Ministry of Law and Justice formally notifying the resignation through an official communication issued on May 27, 2026, marking an unexpected development within the higher judiciary.
The Supreme Court of India held that disciplinary proceedings against judicial officers are invalid unless authorised by the High Court Chief Justice or a committee constituted by him, while upholding reinstatement of a dismissed Uttarakhand civil judge and restricting Registrar General powers.
Uttarakhand High Court ruled father cannot avoid child maintenance citing mother’s income or liabilities. Justice Ashish Naithani upheld order directing Rs 8000 monthly support under Section 125 CrPC.
Uttarakhand High Court ruled that both individuals are minors, prioritising legal protection over the couple’s plea. The Court ordered the girl to be shifted to a shelter home and directed police to take the male companion into custody.
The Uttarakhand High Court ruled that mere suspicion about a spouse’s character and strained relations do not establish abetment of suicide under IPC. Justice Ashish Naithani allowed a husband’s appeal, setting aside related criminal liability.
The Uttarakhand High Court reprimanded a runaway couple who married against family wishes but directed police protection. Justice Rakesh Thapliyal heard the case involving an 18-year-old woman and 21-year-old man facing threats from her relatives.
Uttarakhand High Court refused to quash the FIR against gym owner Deepak Kumar and barred him from commenting on social media. The Court said online posts could affect investigation and directed strict compliance with legal procedure.
