Since November 2022, 221 names have been recommended for High Court judgeships across India. Of these, 29 appointments are still pending with the Central government, raising concerns over delays in judicial functioning.
The Bombay High Court has initiated suo motu action regarding lengthy adoption delays in India, following a Times of India report indicating an average wait of 3.5 years for prospective parents. With 35,500 families registered and only 2,400 children available, the court has called for responses from CARA and the government.
A CRPF jawan seeks the J&K High Court’s intervention to prevent the deportation of his Pakistani wife following the Pahalgam terror attack. The Court has directed the Union Government to respond by May 14, while examining the legality of their online marriage and the wife’s visa status amidst national security concerns.
Today, On 28th April,In the Krishna Janmabhoomi–Shahi Idgah dispute, the Supreme Court upheld the High Court order allowing the Hindu side to amend their plea, stating, “One thing is clear, amendment must be allowed,” while hearing the appeal filed by the Muslim side against the High Court order allowing the amendment.
Top government sources emphasized that “respect for judiciary is paramount” amid the ongoing controversy. This statement was made in response to recent tensions between the judiciary and government institutions, highlighting the importance of maintaining the judiciary’s integrity and its vital role in India’s democratic system.
Today, On 16th April, Senior Advocate Kapil Sibal, arguing before the Supreme Court, strongly opposed the Waqf (Amendment) Act, 2025. He said allowing a state-appointed Collector to decide if a property is waqf makes the officer a “judge in his own cause”, which is unconstitutional.
Today, On 16th April, During the Waqf Amendment Act hearing, Solicitor General Tushar Mehta’s remark” Then this bench also cannot hear the case” created a sharp response from the Supreme Court, which questioned the inclusion of non-Muslims in Waqf bodies and pressed the Centre for clarity.
Today, On 16th April, The Supreme Court, while examining the Waqf Amendment Act, remarked that undoing the concept of ‘waqf by user’ would create huge problems. The Court highlighted the serious impact but did not grant interim relief.
Today, On 15th April, The Supreme Court will consider a fresh plea challenging the provisions of the 2025 Waqf Act, with the Chief Justice stating, “We give dates mostly within a week” for cases involving mentioning slips. The petitioners argue the amendments infringe on Muslim religious autonomy and the management of waqf properties.
Today, On 8th April, During a hearing on a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) highlighting the rise in crimes against women, particularly rape cases, the Supreme Court made a strong appeal to the government. The bench stated, “Leave the women alone in this country; let them grow,” urging authorities to broaden sensitisation efforts. The Court stressed the urgent need for awareness and prevention measures. It emphasized that protecting women’s rights and dignity must be a national priority.
