A retired Delhi Public School teacher has moved the Delhi High Court challenging laws that prohibit teachers from giving private tuitions, calling the ban “unreasonable.” The Court will hear the matter next on November 12.
The Allahabad High Court has rescheduled the hearing in the Krishna Janmabhoomi–Shahi Idgah dispute to September 26. The matter, involving claims over the birthplace of Lord Krishna, continues to remain one of the most closely watched legal battles.
The Supreme Court has transferred all petitions challenging the Promotion and Regulation of Online Gaming Act, 2025 from Delhi, Karnataka, and Madhya Pradesh High Courts to itself. The landmark case will now settle the constitutional validity of India’s first nationwide ban on online gaming for stakes.
A PIL has been filed in the Delhi High Court demanding the enforcement of the Delhi Panchayati Raj Act, 1954, to ensure local self-governance in rural areas of the capital. The Court has sought clarity on whether the Act is still valid and applicable.
Supreme Court gives last chance to Centre, issues notice to States on plea to ban online betting apps; petitioner claims 100 million youth affected.
In the Krishna Janmabhoomi-Shahi Idgah dispute, the Allahabad High Court has allowed a civil suit to proceed as a representative case, permitting the plaintiffs to represent all devotees of Lord Krishna in the legal proceedings.
Today, On 4th July, In the ongoing Krishna Janmabhoomi-Shahi Idgah dispute, the Allahabad High Court has dismissed a petition from the Hindu side that sought to label the Shahi Idgah mosque as a ‘disputed structure’ linked to the Mathura temple.
The Himachal Pradesh High Court ruled that parents are entitled to family pension if the widow of a deceased government employee remarries. The Court directed pension benefits for an 83-year-old mother of a BSF jawan.
Delhi High Court has dismissed a plea challenging the demolition of the Pakistani-Hindu refugee camp at Majnu Ka Tila, stating the petitioners had “no right to continue to occupy the area,” upholding government action on encroachment.
The Supreme Court has clearly told the Centre that no written exam or viva voce will be needed to appoint or reappoint presidents and judicial members of consumer commissions. It also directed ensuring a fixed five-year tenure.
