Bombay High Court Restrains Fake Websites and fraudulent franchise offers using the NATURAL ice cream marks in an ad-interim order passed on October 8, 2026 against unknown John Doe defendants.
The Delhi High Court has suspended 125 websites and ordered the takedown of one blogspot page for allegedly misusing the Jio trademark to offer lottery and gaming services, granting Reliance Industries an ad interim injunction. New Delhi: The Delhi High Court has directed domain name registrars to suspend 125 websites, along with a further web […]
The Bombay High Court ruled in favour of Sun Pharma in a trademark dispute over Pantocid. The court restrained Zawadi Healthcare from using Pantozed, citing risk of confusion in medicines.
The Delhi High Court directed Dr Reddy’s Laboratories to stop selling or expanding its diabetes drug “Olymviq,” citing phonetic similarity with Novo Nordisk’s “Ozempic.” Justice Jyoti Singh noted such similarity in pharma crosses an unacceptable threshold, indicating prima facie trademark infringement.
The Bombay High Court refused to restrain Tata Play from using the name “Tata Play Astro Duniya” for its astrology channel. Justice Sharmila U Deshmukh held no prima facie trademark infringement in the plea by astrologer Rajeev Prakash Agarwal.
The Delhi High Court upheld a permanent injunction against Crocodile International for infringing the crocodile trademark and logo copyright of Lacoste, with Justices Hari Shankar and Om Prakash Shukla affirming Lacoste’s rights.
The Delhi High Court restrained operators of fake fantasy gaming apps from using trademarks or copying the interface of Dream11. Justice Jyoti Singh passed the interim order in a suit by Sporta Technologies Private Limited.
The Delhi High Court has granted an interim injunction restraining Deepika Padukone’s company from using the ‘Lotus Splash’ mark for its face cleanser. The Court held that the mark is prima facie similar to Lotus Herbals’ registered ‘Lotus’ trademark and may cause consumer confusion.
The Delhi High Court has passed an interim order restraining digital news channel ‘Charcha Aaj Ki’ from using a logo and colour scheme similar to Aaj Tak. The Court held that Aaj Tak made out a strong prima facie case of trademark infringement and protected its well-known red-white-black logo identity.
The Delhi High Court has cancelled the ‘Activepushpa’ trademark, holding it deceptively similar to the earlier registered ‘Hempushpa’ mark. The court ruled that the mark was dishonestly adopted and could confuse consumers of ayurvedic medicines.
