Supreme Court of India sought Union response on vacancies in Armed Forces Tribunal. Bench of Surya Kant and Joymalya Bagchi sought R Venkataramani assistance, listing hearing.
Supreme Court of India sought response from Karnataka on plea by Darshan alleging denial of basic jail facilities. Bench of J B Pardiwala and R Mahadevan issued notice.
Supreme Court of India issued notice on challenge to Transgender Persons Amendment Act 2026, refusing stay. Bench of Surya Kant and Joymalya Bagchi heard plea citing NALSA judgment 2014.
Supreme Court of India issued notice on PIL seeking revenue judicial service and legal qualifications. Bench of Surya Kant and Joymalya Bagchi heard plea by Ashwini Upadhyay.
The Supreme Court of India has issued notice to the Centre on a plea questioning the validity of the National Investigation Agency Act, 2008. The case raises major concerns about federal powers, NIA authority, and constitutional rights across India.
The Supreme Court has sought responses from the Centre, States, and UTs on a plea seeking steps to prevent stray cattle from entering national and state highways. The plea also demands highway fencing, cattle shelters, penalties for abandonment, and compensation for accident victims.
The CBI has approached the Supreme Court seeking cancellation of bail granted to two accused in the Manipur violence case involving gangrape and public parading of two women. The Supreme Court has issued notice and also directed immediate legal aid support for the victims.
The Supreme Court has issued notice on a plea challenging the reconstruction and disinvestment of the Teesta-III Hydroelectric Project after the 2023 Sikkim GLOF disaster. The plea cites environmental risks, lack of public consultation, and arbitrary disinvestment of a public project.
The Supreme Court has questioned the Bar Council of India over its claim that “criminals have started entering the legal profession” while defending denial of enrollment to law graduates with pending criminal cases. The Court said such a restriction may not be valid without a clear law under the Advocates Act.
The Supreme Court ordered status quo in the defamation case against lawyer and BJP leader Koustav Bagchi over social media posts sharing excerpts from a book about Mamata Banerjee. The Court also issued notice to the West Bengal government while hearing Bagchi’s challenge to the summons issued by a trial court.
