Assault On Doctors: Supreme Court Cancels Shiv Sena Corporator Ramesh Mhatre’s Bail, Orders Surrender In Three Days

The Supreme Court has cancelled the bail granted to Shiv Sena corporator Ramesh Sukrya Mhatre in a case alleging assault on doctors and hospital staff, directing him to surrender within three days.

Punjab Withdraws Its Habeas Corpus Plea Over The ED’s GMADA Search After Officers Are Set Free

The State of Punjab has withdrawn its habeas corpus petition in the Punjab and Haryana High Court over the Enforcement Directorate’s search at the GMADA headquarters, after the search ended and the officers the State alleged were illegally confined were set free. A court-appointed Warrant Officer had reported that the officers themselves said they were not illegally detained. The Court allowed the withdrawal with liberty to raise all issues before an appropriate forum.

A Power Of Attorney Sale Confers No Title And Cannot Regularise Unauthorised Construction: Punjab And Haryana High Court

The Punjab and Haryana High Court has dismissed a challenge to the demolition of structures raised on agricultural land within the Chandigarh Periphery ‘Control Area’, holding that a General Power of Attorney or similar document confers no title and cannot regularise unauthorised construction. Livelihood, the Court held, cannot be a licence to violate the periphery-control law. Only the unauthorised structures, not the land, are to be removed.

Can A Defector’s Original Mandate Still Reflect Support For The Faction He Later Joined?: Justice Bagchi’s Question In Shiv Sena Case

As the Shiv Sena symbol hearing continued, Justice Joymalya Bagchi raised a question he said earlier decisions had not considered: whether an elected representative’s original electoral mandate can still be treated as support for a faction he later joins after a split. He pressed whether the Election Commission had considered all available options, including declining the historic symbol to both sides, and flagged that the answer would affect similar cases beyond this dispute.

No Cloud Of Disqualification Hangs Over Our MPs Today: Shinde Faction Defends Legislative-Majority Test In Shiv Sena Symbol Case

Resuming his submissions in the Shiv Sena symbol dispute, Senior Advocate Neeraj Kishan Kaul told the Supreme Court that the 40 MLAs backing the Shinde faction accounted for 76% of the vote secured by Shiv Sena’s winning candidates, that all disqualification proceedings against the faction stand dismissed with no stay, and that the pending petitions therefore have no bearing on the symbol question. He argued against making the two interim symbols a permanent arrangement.

Could The ECI Have Denied The Symbol To Both Uddhav & Shinde Factions?: Supreme Court Asks In Shiv Sena Hearing

As the Shiv Sena split hearing continued, Justice Joymalya Bagchi asked whether the Election Commission, finding all three tests problematic, could have denied the reserved symbol to both factions and let each establish its strength independently without drawing on Balasaheb Thackeray’s legacy. Senior Advocate Neeraj Kishan Kaul, for the Shinde faction, defended the Commission’s reliance on organisational structure. The matter is part-heard.

The Split Was In The Party, Not Just Among Legislators: Shinde Faction Tells Supreme Court As Shiv Sena Hearing Resumes

A Bench led by CJI Surya Kant resumed hearing the Shiv Sena split case, in which the Uddhav Thackeray faction challenges the Maharashtra Speaker’s refusal to disqualify Eknath Shinde faction MLAs and the Election Commission’s recognition of the Shinde group as the Shiv Sena. Senior Advocate Neeraj Kishan Kaul argued that the split was in the political party itself. The hearing continues.

A Party Constitution On Paper Cannot Stop The EC From Examining How The Organisation Actually Works: Neeraj Kishan Kaul In Shiv Sena Case

Defending the Election Commission’s recognition of the Shinde faction, Senior Advocate Neeraj Kishan Kaul argued in the Supreme Court that the Commission’s power under Article 324 lets it look past a party constitution on paper to how the organisation actually functions, and that an organisational majority resting on ad hoc appointees may not reflect the will of the cadre. The submissions are his; nothing has been decided.

“Can We Disqualify Shinde?”: Supreme Court’s Key Question In Shiv Sena Case

Hearing the Shiv Sena disqualification case, the Supreme Court asked whether it could itself declare Shinde-faction MLAs disqualified or only set aside the Speaker’s order and remand it. New Delhi: The Supreme Court on Wednesday, hearing the Uddhav Thackeray-led Shiv Sena’s challenge to the Maharashtra Speaker’s refusal to disqualify Eknath Shinde faction MLAs, asked whether […]

Shiv Sena Case: Speaker Treated Legislators As The Party Itself, Sibal Tells Supreme Court

Arguing the Shiv Sena disqualification case, Kapil Sibal told the Supreme Court the Maharashtra Speaker “distorted” the Tenth Schedule by treating the legislative party as the political party. New Delhi: The Supreme Court on Tuesday resumed hearing the Uddhav Thackeray-led Shiv Sena’s challenge to the Maharashtra Speaker’s refusal to disqualify MLAs of the Eknath Shinde […]