Today, On 16th June, The Supreme Court once again questioned why top lawyers appear during court vacations, saying, “We don’t understand the appearance of senior counsel in vacations.” The bench expressed concern over disregarding regular court procedures during breaks.
The Supreme Court of India criticized lawyers for submitting bulky appeals filled with unnecessary documentation. Justices Oka and Bhuyan highlighted the misuse of synopses that mix case citations with grounds for appeal, emphasizing that this trend, linked to litigants’ financial capabilities, undermines traditional legal procedures. The court demanded a return to concise pleadings.
Justice Surya Kant announced that poor convicts in India will soon be permitted to choose a top Senior Advocate for free representation in the Supreme Court, addressing legal needs of over 4,200 identified convicts. This initiative aims to ensure access to justice regardless of financial status, reflecting India’s commitment to constitutional values.
NEW DELHI: This Sunday, Delhi will witness an exciting cricket match between judges and lawyers. But this time, the battle is not in the courtroom—it is on the cricket field. A team of sitting Supreme Court and High Court judges, led by Chief Justice of India (CJI) Sanjiv Khanna, will compete against the Supreme Court Advocates-on-Record (SCAORA) XI.
The Supreme Court directed newly designated Senior Advocates to inform their clients about their senior status. This move aims to ensure transparency and awareness among litigants. The designation comes with added responsibilities and higher fees, making disclosure crucial. The court’s directive reinforces ethical legal practices.
NEW DELHI: On Friday(31st Jan), the Supreme Court decided not to entertain a petition that challenged the senior designation of 70 advocates by the Delhi High Court. This petition was filed by Advocate Sanjay Dubey, who had applied for the senior designation but was not granted it by the Delhi High Court.
Today, On 2nd January, The Supreme Court granted time to Mathews Nedumpara to reflect on his plea challenging the designation of Senior Advocates. Nedumpara had made various strong allegations against the institution, which the court described as “scurrilous averments.” The court asked him to reconsider his petition, allowing time for reflection. This matter involves a legal challenge to the process of conferring Senior Advocate status.
An Advocate-on-Record (AoR) is a specialized lawyer authorized to represent clients in the Supreme Court of India, handling case filings, drafting petitions, and ensuring compliance with court procedures. To qualify, AoRs must pass a specialized exam after training. Their role is crucial for effective legal representation and maintaining court integrity.
