NEW DELHI: On Friday(31st Jan), the Supreme Court decided not to entertain a petition that challenged the senior designation of 70 advocates by the Delhi High Court. This petition was filed by Advocate Sanjay Dubey, who had applied for the senior designation but was not granted it by the Delhi High Court.
Today, On 2nd January, The Supreme Court granted time to Mathews Nedumpara to reflect on his plea challenging the designation of Senior Advocates. Nedumpara had made various strong allegations against the institution, which the court described as “scurrilous averments.” The court asked him to reconsider his petition, allowing time for reflection. This matter involves a legal challenge to the process of conferring Senior Advocate status.
An Advocate-on-Record (AoR) is a specialized lawyer authorized to represent clients in the Supreme Court of India, handling case filings, drafting petitions, and ensuring compliance with court procedures. To qualify, AoRs must pass a specialized exam after training. Their role is crucial for effective legal representation and maintaining court integrity.
A petition has been filed in the Supreme Court challenging the Delhi High Court’s designation of 70 lawyers as Senior Advocates. Following the designation process, a committee member resigned, alleging the final list was altered without his approval. The Supreme Court’s response will address concerns about the transparency of the designation process.
The Delhi High Court has designated 70 lawyers as Senior Advocates, while the applications of 67 others have been deferred. A committee recommended the designations after interviewing over 300 candidates, with decisions on those scoring between 65 and 69 marks put on hold.
Controversy has arisen over the Delhi High Court’s Senior Advocate designation process following the resignation of Sudhir Nandrajog from the Permanent Committee. He did not approve the final list of 70 designated lawyers, raising concerns about procedural transparency. Nandrajog cited non-compliance with rules but had been involved in prior discussions.
Lenders have accused Byju’s former management of attempting to dilute Think and Learn’s stake in Aakash, stressing its crucial role for the company’s value. The National Company Law Tribunal is involved, with several legal representatives addressing ongoing insolvency claims and management control over Aakash, amid ongoing disputes and pending applications.
Several counsels gathered to present their matters before Chief Justice of India (CJI) DY Chandrachud. Senior Advocate Dwivedi expressed, “Mylords nobody wants your tenure to end, we all want you to hear our matters!” The week beginning Today (November 4) will be Dr. DY Chandrachud’s final week serving as the Chief Justice of India, as he is set to retire next Sunday.
On Tuesday(10th Sept),The Supreme Court reprimanded advocates for presenting misleading facts in remission cases, stating it erodes trust in the judicial system. A bench led by Justices Oka and Masih dismissed a petition from nine undertrials, highlighting recurring false claims.
The Telangana High Court directed the State Legislative Assembly to address disqualification petitions against defected MLAs within four weeks. The Court stated that if no action is taken, the matter will be reopened and appropriate orders passed. The bench questioned the tolerance of the Speaker’s inaction and emphasized the need for timely resolution.
