• Thu. Mar 26th, 2026
    • '

    Tag: Senior Advocates

    Supreme Court Designates Seven Former High Court Judges As Senior Advocates
    Supreme Court Designates Seven Former High Court Judges As Senior Advocates
    Supreme Court

    Supreme Court Designates Seven Former High Court Judges As Senior Advocates

    The Supreme Court of India has designated seven former High Court judges as Senior Advocates following a Full Court meeting led by the Chief Justice of India. A March 19, 2026 notification grants retrospective effect from March 18, 2026.

    author
    Gym Owner’s Business Collapses After Viral Video: 15 Senior SC Advocates Buy One-Year Membership at Mohammad Deepak’s Gym
    Gym Owner’s Business Collapses After Viral Video: 15 Senior SC Advocates Buy One-Year Membership at Mohammad Deepak’s Gym
    Legal updatesHeadlines

    Gym Owner’s Business Collapses After Viral Video: 15 Senior SC Advocates Buy One-Year Membership at Mohammad Deepak’s Gym

    The legal community has stepped forward to support Deepak Kumar, a Kotdwar gym owner whose business collapsed after a viral communal video. Fifteen senior advocates from the Supreme Court of India purchased annual memberships at Hulk Gym this week.

    author
    Supreme Court Lawyers Join Together to Wish CJI Surya Kant on His Birthday
    Supreme Court Lawyers Join Together to Wish CJI Surya Kant on His Birthday
    Supreme CourtHeadlines

    Supreme Court Lawyers Join Together to Wish CJI Surya Kant on His Birthday

    Today, On 10th February, The legal community gathered in the Supreme Court to wish Chief Justice of India Surya Kant on his birthday, as lawyers across the Bar greeted him warmly. CJI Surya Kant acknowledged their wishes with a gracious “Thank you.”

    author
    You Cannot Try to Crumble the Judiciary of This Country: Supreme Court Slams NGO for Article 32 Plea Against Its Own Judgment
    You Cannot Try to Crumble the Judiciary of This Country: Supreme Court Slams NGO for Article 32 Plea Against Its Own Judgment
    Supreme CourtHeadlines

    You Cannot Try to Crumble the Judiciary of This Country: Supreme Court Slams NGO for Article 32 Plea Against Its Own Judgment

    Today, On 12th December, A tense moment arose in the Supreme Court when an NGO filed a writ petition seeking to overturn one of the Court’s own judgments. The Bench warned the petitioner, saying, “Let this serve as a message. You cannot try to crumble the judiciary of this country.”

    author
    Historic Step: Supreme Court Designates Four Former High Court Judges as Senior Advocates
    Historic Step: Supreme Court Designates Four Former High Court Judges as Senior Advocates
    Supreme CourtHeadlines

    Historic Step: Supreme Court Designates Four Former High Court Judges as Senior Advocates

    In a landmark Full Court decision on December 10, 2025, the Supreme Court exercised its constitutional powers to confer Senior Advocate status on four retired High Court judges, marking a significant moment for the Indian legal fraternity.

    author
    Supreme Court Designates 5 Former High Court Judges as Senior Advocates
    Supreme Court Designates 5 Former High Court Judges as Senior Advocates
    Legal updatesSupreme Court

    Supreme Court Designates 5 Former High Court Judges as Senior Advocates

    The Supreme Court of India has designated five former High Court judges, including one former Chief Justice, as Senior Advocates. The decision was made in a Full Court Meeting held on October 29, 2025, and takes effect immediately.

    author
    BREAKING| Such Summons Could Infringe Fundamental Rights Of Accused: Supreme Court Slams Investigating Agencies for Summoning Advocates
    BREAKING| Such Summons Could Infringe Fundamental Rights Of Accused: Supreme Court Slams Investigating Agencies for Summoning Advocates
    Supreme CourtHeadlines

    BREAKING| Such Summons Could Infringe Fundamental Rights Of Accused: Supreme Court Slams Investigating Agencies for Summoning Advocates

    Today, On 31st October, The Supreme Court ruled that investigating agencies must not summon advocates representing the accused, stressing that “such summons could infringe fundamental rights of the accused” and violate statutory provisions protecting lawyer-client confidentiality under Section 132 and the new BNSS framework.

    author
    Supreme Court Issues Bailable Warrant Against Lawyer Over ‘Scandalous’ Complaint Targeting Judges and Senior Advocates
    Supreme Court Issues Bailable Warrant Against Lawyer Over ‘Scandalous’ Complaint Targeting Judges and Senior Advocates
    Supreme Court

    Supreme Court Issues Bailable Warrant Against Lawyer Over ‘Scandalous’ Complaint Targeting Judges and Senior Advocates

    The Supreme Court issued bailable warrants against advocate Mukut Nath Verma for filing a “scandalous and frivolous” complaint against SCBA Election Committee members and judges. The Court warned such defamatory actions cannot go unchecked and prima facie constitute criminal contempt.

    author
    P&H High Court Bench Hunting Row: Bar Council Clears Senior Advocates Rakesh Nehra & Puneet Bali
    P&H High Court Bench Hunting Row: Bar Council Clears Senior Advocates Rakesh Nehra & Puneet Bali
    High CourtLatest news

    P&H High Court Bench Hunting Row: Bar Council Clears Senior Advocates Rakesh Nehra & Puneet Bali

    The Bar Council of Punjab & Haryana has given a clean chit to Senior Advocates Rakesh Nehra and Puneet Bali in the bench hunting probe. The Committee said no evidence surfaced against them and their integrity remains untarnished.

    author
    CJI Gavai to Harish Salve: "We’re Not Taking Mentions from Senior Advocates" but Allows Virtual Appearance
    CJI Gavai to Harish Salve: "We’re Not Taking Mentions from Senior Advocates" but Allows Virtual Appearance
    Supreme CourtHeadlines

    CJI Gavai to Harish Salve: “We’re Not Taking Mentions from Senior Advocates” but Allows Virtual Appearance

    In the presidential reference case, CJI B.R. Gavai initially refused Harish Salve’s urgent mention but permitted him to appear virtually after personal reasons were cited. The court stressed such requests should go through the AoR and questioned the presence of top law officers.

    author