• Mon. May 25th, 2026
    • '

    Tag: Sabarimala review case

    Unnao Rape Case: Supreme Court Refuses Early Hearing, Sengar to Remain in Jail as Big Legal Question Looms
    Unnao Rape Case: Supreme Court Refuses Early Hearing, Sengar to Remain in Jail as Big Legal Question Looms
    Supreme Court

    Unnao Rape Case: Supreme Court Refuses Early Hearing, Sengar to Remain in Jail as Big Legal Question Looms

    The Supreme Court has deferred the hearing on the CBI’s plea challenging suspension of Kuldeep Singh Sengar’s life sentence in the Unnao rape case. The Court said Sengar will remain in custody and key legal questions on “public servant” status will be examined in May.

    author
    Sabarimala Review: “Courts Must Not Decide What Is Essential Religious Practice,” Muslim Personal Law Board Tells Supreme Court
    Sabarimala Review: “Courts Must Not Decide What Is Essential Religious Practice,” Muslim Personal Law Board Tells Supreme Court
    Supreme CourtHeadlines

    Sabarimala Review: “Courts Must Not Decide What Is Essential Religious Practice,” Muslim Personal Law Board Tells Supreme Court

    The Muslim Personal Law Board told the Supreme Court that courts should not decide the “essential religious practices” of any religion. The 9-judge Bench will hear the Sabarimala review case from April 7, 2026, on the scope of religious freedom under Articles 25 and 26.

    author
    We May Have To Cross Some Unforeseen Bridges: Supreme Court 9-Judge Bench To Hear Sabarimala Temple Reference From April 7
    We May Have To Cross Some Unforeseen Bridges: Supreme Court 9-Judge Bench To Hear Sabarimala Temple Reference From April 7
    Supreme CourtHeadlines

    We May Have To Cross Some Unforeseen Bridges: Supreme Court  9-Judge Bench To Hear Sabarimala Temple Reference From April 7

    A Bench of the Supreme Court of India will begin hearings on the Sabarimala Temple review from April 7, examining questions on freedom and entry. Today, Surya Kant, Joymalya Bagchi, and Vipul M. Pancholi asked parties to submit arguments by March 14.

    author