The Bombay High Court directed the Centre and Maharashtra government to keep investigation reports on threats and an alleged attack against retired Justice Gautam Patel confidential. The Court ordered sealed preservation of reports, noting the matter relates to threats allegedly linked to a judicial verdict.
The Supreme Court expressed concern over threats and attacks targeting retired Bombay High Court judge Justice Gautam Patel and his family, warning that such incidents threaten judicial independence and the administration of justice. The Court observed that fear and intimidation could discourage judges from delivering impartial judgments.
The Bombay Bar Association condemned alleged threats, intimidation, and attacks targeting retired Bombay High Court judge Gautam Patel and his family over the Dawoodi Bohra succession judgment. Calling it a direct assault on judicial independence and the rule of law, the Association demanded accountability and protection.
Retired Bombay High Court judge Justice G.S. Patel’s family has allegedly faced threats and violence for ten months across two continents, linked to his landmark April 2024 judgment in the Dawoodi Bohra succession dispute.
The Supreme Court has provided clarity on identifying the law applicable to arbitration agreements. The ruling addresses conflicts arising from multiple arbitration clauses in international commercial contracts governed by Indian law. It establishes guidelines for resolving such disputes effectively. This decision strengthens the legal framework for arbitration in cross-border agreements.
The West Bengal Government today has set up a seven-member committee, led by a retired judge of the Calcutta High Court, to review three new criminal laws that replaced the British-era laws on July 1. The committee, including state ministers, the advocate general, and police officials, will submit its findings within three months. West Bengal is the third state to amend these laws.
