The Bombay High Court ruled that alleged sexual harassment during travel in shared public transport not arranged by an employer does not fall within the definition of a “workplace” under the POSH Act. Consequently, such incidents cannot be examined through the Act’s workplace harassment framework.
The Supreme Court set aside the conviction of a KSRTC bus driver, holding that following a conductor’s signal to move the vehicle cannot by itself amount to criminal negligence. The Court ruled that a driver acting on the conductor’s instructions performs a normal duty and cannot be faulted without evidence of recklessness.
The Allahabad High Court issued austerity measures to reduce fuel consumption and improve resource efficiency, directing officers and staff to adopt car pooling, public transport, online meetings, and hybrid court proceedings. The initiative follows guidance from the Chief Justice of India and the Central Government.
Madhya Pradesh High Court delivers justice after 25 years, reinstating railway booking clerk Narayan Nair dismissed over an alleged Rs.10 excess charge. Court finds vigilance action illegal, says he was denied fair hearing, restores dignity and service benefits.
The Karnataka High Court, lifted the ban on bike taxis. The Court said the State may impose regulatory conditions but cannot reject taxi registration applications merely because the vehicle is a motorcycle.
ANI Technologies argued in the Karnataka High Court that the state’s refusal to grant bike taxi permits violates fundamental rights, asserting that bike taxis are essential for urban mobility. The case highlights the balance between regulation and innovation, questioning executive powers in policy-making against existing legislation and emphasizing the public interest in transportation choices.
A Kerala Consumer Court has ordered Southern Railway to pay Rs 52,500 to five passengers who missed their temple pilgrimage due to a train delay. The court criticized the Railway’s service and emphasized the need for public transport improvements. The delay was not justified, and the passengers deserved compensation for their distress.
The Supreme Court emphasized that the railways are a key part of the country’s infrastructure, and any attempts to disrupt the ticketing system must be firmly stopped. Highlighting the importance of a smooth and secure system, the court urged strong measures to prevent such threats. The railways play a crucial role in connecting the nation and supporting its economy. Safeguarding its ticketing system is vital to ensuring efficiency and public trust.
