The Supreme Court denied anticipatory bail to two men accused of obstructing road construction, assaulting workers, and making caste-based remarks. The Court criticised alleged misuse of RTI activism, observing that some individuals were interfering with public authorities and official duties.
The Delhi High Court ruled that the Lokpal must mandatorily hear public servants before ordering any investigation. The Court quashed a corruption probe against a Railway officer for violating Section 20(3) and principles of natural justice.
Delhi Police has issued a new circular under BNSS 2023, stating that ‘police witnesses will now be examined through electronic communication and video conferencing.’ This move aims to speed up legal proceedings and ensure smooth witness examination.
Today, On 6th August, The Supreme Court has reserved its verdict on petitions challenging the 2018 amendments to the Prevention of Corruption Act. It questioned how governance benefits when honest decisions are attacked by frivolous online allegations against officers.
Supreme Court hears challenge to Section 17A of the Prevention of Corruption Act, raising concerns over misuse. Justice Nagarathna warns: “It can protect honest officers — or dishonest ones.”
In a strong observation, the Supreme Court asked, “Why should a corrupt public official be allowed to resume the job?” while questioning reinstatement after conviction, raising serious concerns about integrity in public service roles.
The Supreme Court ruled that prior government approval is a must before prosecuting public servants if their actions are tied to official duties. This protects officers from false or unnecessary criminal cases.
With the introduction of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (“BNSS”), it is crucial to examine how the law on sanction under crpc and bnss continues to uphold procedural safeguards for public servants.
New Delhi, March 11: The Rouse Avenue Court on Tuesday(11th March) granted bail to Tej Pratap Yadav, Hema Yadav, and other accused individuals in the Land-for-Job scam case. They appeared before the court following the summons issued to them. Lalu Prasad Yadav, Rabri Devi, and Misa Bharti filed exemption applications.
The Lokpal has dismissed a corruption complaint against former Chief Justice of India (CJI) DY Chandrachud, citing lack of jurisdiction. The anti-corruption Inspector clarified that sitting judges and the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court do not fall within its purview under Section 14 of the Lokpal and Lokayuktas Act. This provision restricts the Lokpal’s authority to probe complaints against such high-ranking judicial officials.
