The Kerala High Court has held that a 50% maintenance deposit as a condition for condoning delay cannot ordinarily be imposed on an appellant, since it fetters the statutory right of appeal. Kochi: The Kerala High Court has set aside a Sessions Court order that refused to condone delay in a domestic violence appeal because […]
Justice Madhu Jain of the Delhi High Court dismissed a woman’s petition seeking to revive domestic violence proceedings against her father-in-law, holding that a father cannot be made liable under the Act merely because he did not control the conduct of his adult son.
The Delhi High Court has ruled that a daughter-in-law cannot claim an independent right to continue residing in her mother-in-law’s self-acquired property once the residential rights granted to her husband come to an end. The Court held that ownership rights of the mother-in-law cannot be defeated by such residential claims.
The Delhi High Court has held that allegations of physical assault, verbal abuse, and obscene or inappropriate conduct within a household at the interim stage fall within the broad definition of domestic violence under the PWDV Act 2005.
The Delhi High Court held that a wife’s right to reside in her shared household under the Domestic Violence Act cannot be denied merely because her husband was disowned by his parents, affirming that the marital home qualifies as shared regardless of ownership.
A Mumbai sessions court increased compensation from Rs 5 lakh to Rs 1 crore for a woman facing 20 years of domestic abuse, calling her husband “crorepati” and “rolling in money.” Monthly maintenance was also raised to Rs 1.5 lakh for her and her daughter.
Today, On 18th February, The Supreme Court criticized states and Union Territories for failing to submit status reports on implementing the Domestic Violence Act. Expressing strong disapproval, the court emphasized the need for accountability in protecting victims’ rights. It directed authorities to ensure proper enforcement and support mechanisms for affected individuals. The bench warned of serious consequences for continued non-compliance.
Uttarakhand: Observing that a person’s self-respect should not be sacrificed in the name of privacy, especially when the person is a child born in a live-in relationship, the Uttarakhand High Court on Wednesday questioned what was wrong with regulating such relationships.
The Supreme Court of India criticized a Magistrate’s issuance of bailable warrants against Alisha Berry in a domestic violence case filed by her mother-in-law under the D.V. Act. The Court deemed the warrants unnecessary and agreed to transfer the case from Delhi to Ludhiana, highlighting the quasi-criminal nature of D.V. proceedings.
The Justice for Rights Foundation NGO filed an application in the Supreme Court regarding the criminalization of marital rape, voicing concerns over potential misuse of laws. They argue existing protections are sufficient and warn that new legal frameworks could lead to wrongful accusations, impacting the sanctity of marriage and mediation efforts.
