The Delhi High Court has reserved its order on pleas filed by Batla House residents challenging demolition notices issued by the DDA. Petitioners claim their properties are legal and backed by proper documents, including affidavits.
The Supreme Court of India has ruled that property registration does not equate to actual ownership, emphasizing the need for comprehensive legal documentation and court validation. This decision impacts property buyers, legal professionals, and real estate developers, highlighting the importance of thorough documentation in confirming true ownership rights and resolving disputes.
The Supreme Court will hear in July a petition challenging the proposed demolition of alleged illegal structures in Okhla village. The plea raises concerns over residents’ rights and the legality of the demolition drive.
The Delhi High Court has temporarily halted the eviction of 115 families in Okhla by the Uttar Pradesh Irrigation Department, which issued eviction notices despite lacking legal ownership of the land. The next hearing is scheduled for August 4, allowing residents to challenge the notices deemed arbitrary and illegal.
Petitioners are contesting the Waqf (Amendment) Act, 2025 in the Supreme Court, arguing it allows government seizure of waqf properties through non-judicial means, compromising their religious status. Senior advocate Kapil Sibal claims the amendment undermines past protections and may lead to loss of waqf status if not registered, raising significant legal concerns.
The Supreme Court has ordered the eviction of a tenant’s legal heir and directed the return of the Mansarovar Palace cinema hall in Prayagraj to its rightful owners after 63 years. The court remarked, “We finally bring the curtains down on this long drawn out litigation.”
Today, On 21st April, The Supreme Court asked the concerned Rajasthan authority to respond to a contempt petition related to a demolition case. The plea alleges that the authority violated court orders during the demolition process.
NEW DELHI: Today,15th April: Some Hindu parties have gone to the Supreme Court to challenge the constitutional validity of the Waqf Act, 1995, as changed by the new Waqf (Amendment) Act, 2025. They say the law is unfair and violates the rights of Hindus and non-Muslims.
Karnataka: The Karnataka High Court has reserved its verdict on a petition challenging the constitutional validity of the Karnataka Micro Loan and Small Loan (Prevention of Coercive Actions) Ordinance, 2025.
In India, ancestral land holds immense cultural and legal significance. Passed down through generations, it serves as a testament to a family’s heritage, traditions, and emotional ties. However, the question of whether ancestral property can be sold without the consent of heirs is a complex legal issue that requires careful examination under the relevant laws and judicial precedents
