In a major judgment, the Supreme Court ruled that no tenant—regardless of how long they’ve stayed—can claim ownership of rented property through adverse possession. The Court clarified that tenancy is always based on the owner’s permission, not ownership rights.
The Supreme Court heard a petition challenging the Hindu Succession Act, which directs a childless widow’s property to her husband’s family. Justice BV Nagarathna highlighted, “under Hindu law, a woman’s gotra changes when she marries.”
The Bombay High Court questioned the Slum Rehabilitation Authority (SRA) on how the petitioner’s private land, which has 5 to 6 structures, could be declared a slum merely because it is near an adjoining slum area.
The Supreme Court rejected a request to shift the Waqf Act case from Delhi High Court, remarking, “Petitions are nowadays being filed only for the newspapers” and questioned the urgency behind rushing to court.
Today, On 22nd July, CJI Gavai slams woman’s Rs.12 crore alimony demand after 18-month marriage, questions her need for a BMW despite being highly educated. Says, “You even want a BMW? You’re so educated, learn to earn!”
Supreme Court rules tribal women and their heirs are entitled to equal property rights. Denial based on outdated customs violates constitutional equality.
Explore how daughters’ property rights in India have evolved under the Hindu Succession Act. Learn about legal provisions, coparcenary rights, and inheritance laws for women.
Bombay High Court ruled that an under-construction flat not in possession of either spouse doesn’t qualify as a “shared household” under the DV Act. Hence, the husband cannot be forced to pay pending EMIs.
Today, On 23rd June, In the Batla House demolition case, the Delhi High Court reserved its verdict after hearing arguments on petitions challenging DDA’s notices, as the DDA strongly opposed the pleas filed by long-time residents facing eviction.
The Madras High Court criticized the Enforcement Directorate (ED) for exceeding its authority under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA) during a search operation. Justice Ramesh questioned the legality of restricting access to premises with pasted notices and highlighted concerns about the ED’s expanding powers. A decision is pending.
